Join the Footballguys Daily Update
Start your morning with our roundup of the most important stories in football - with the fantasy insight you need to make league-winning decisions. Delivered straight to your inbox, 100% free.
Each week, this column will take a critical look at key statistical trends to highlight pass rushing and tackle matchups to exploit and avoid. We'll be heavily relying on another great feature at FBG this season, the IDP Matchup Spreadsheet that will be generated by Larry Thomas. That spreadsheet will contain a number of weekly and weekly average statistical measures to help identify those defensive teams who are facing the best and worst opportunity as the season progresses. While this column will include two large tables of tackle and pass rush opportunity and matchup data, it's only a fraction of the data available in the spreadsheet. We hope that the Matchup Spreadsheet and this column will join John Norton's weekly IDP projections, Doug Drinen's Matchup Analyzer Tool and our customizable MyFBG function as useful tools to assist in making weekly line-up and waiver wire decisions.
Before we get to the hard data and matchup analysis, a quick explanation of the metrics we're using will probably be helpful. This column will be broken up into two primary sections - pass rushing matchups to exploit/avoid and tackle matchups to exploit/avoid. Each text section is followed by a table listing the relevant statistics and metrics driving our matchup decisions.
The pass rushing matchup table will include weekly averages of sacks, adjusted averages of sacks and quarterback hits and pass attempts faced. It will also have a column titled Pressure Applied, a metric we're introducing to show how often a team defense is generating pressure on the opposing quarterback. We'll be calculating Pressure Applied by dividing each team defense's sacks and quarterback hits by its total pass attempts faced. The same set of data will be provided and Pressure Allowed calculated for each team offense, to show which offenses are allowing pressure on their quarterback most often.
The tackle matchup table will include weekly averages of both rush and pass attempts faced, total offensive snaps faced and the percentage of rush vs pass attempts faced. It will also have a column titled Tackle Opportunity, a metric we introduced in mid-2007 to show how many plays a defense faced that could have ended in a solo tackle. We'll be calculating each team's Tackle Opportunity by adding all rush attempts, pass completions and sacks - the three plays that can end in a solo tackle outside of special teams and turnover plays. The same set of data will be provided and Tackle Opportunity calculated for each team's offense, to show which offenses are allowing the most tackle opportunity to opposing defenses.
We'll be highlighting the Pressure Applied/Allowed and Tackle Opportunity metrics with color codes showing the best and worst pass rush and tackle matchups. Expect to see lots of “good” and “bad” matchups early, as a relatively low sample size will show a lot of teams outside the historical standard deviations we'll be using to focus on the key matchups. While sample size will be a confounding issue during the early weeks, we'll still make every effort to show where the data looks meaningful. Without getting into a long discussion of statistics, we recognize that these metrics and tables will not be as predictive and reliable early in the season. We also acknowledge the noise within a set of unofficial statistics like solo tackles and quarterback hits. As the season progresses and the standard deviations of the data fall in line with prior seasonal averages, we expect that the data tables will be increasingly more reliable and useful.
You are very welcome to the second edition of what will be a season-long look at the best and worst matchups in the IDP landscape based on detailed, accurate spreadsheet data generated by Larry Thomas on a weekly basis.
For those of you who don’t know me, my name is Dave Larkin. I am a veteran IDP player and what some would call a diehard fan of this game of football that we all love so much.
Defense is my passion. Over the past few years, I have assimilated countless pages of data from various sources to improve my knowledge of the defensive side of the football. Each and every week I will study film from the previous week’s games and provide you with nuggets of wisdom that will lead you to a championship.
Listen to enough of the rhetoric surrounding Week 1 and the one message you’ll consistently hear like a mantra is: It’s only one week, don’t get too high or too low. It is sometimes difficult to remain patient with players who, just a few months ago, had you on their bandwagon, only for them to disappoint in their first outing of the season.
Don’t jump off the wagon too early, though, or you could be burned as they cosy themselves up to other owners in your league and rack up the points. On the flip side, remaining patient too long can be damaging too.
The bottom line is that we are still learning who these teams are, but we have our first data point of the season and we can start to see patterns emerging before too long to help us make better line-up decisions and rack up those wins.
So without further ado, let’s get to the best and worst matchups of Week 2.
Pass Rushing Matchups to Exploit
Miami front seven at Jacksonville
The Dolphins’ vaunted front four could only muster one sack in a tight road victory in the nation’s capital last week; more will be expected within the building this time around. The Jaguars represent a tasty pass rushing matchup if their pass protection blunders against Carolina are anything to go by. Blake Bortles has made baby steps in terms of improvement, but there are still opportunities here for defenses the calibre of Miami’s. This is a classic ‘get well’ game for the road team.
New Orleans front seven vs. Tampa Bay
The Buccaneers much-maligned offensive line lived up to its reputation in Week 1, giving up pressure constantly to a stout Titans front seven. Jameis Winston was given a rocky reception as he was sacked four times and hit six times. The Saints had a rather inauspicious debut in Arizona, but will be pleased to enjoy some home comforts about a vulnerable Bucs offense. The Saints may be without starting cornerback Keenan Lewis, but there are more than enough threats up front to trouble Tampa Bay.
Pass Rushing Matchups to Avoid
Buffalo front seven vs. New England
The Patriots rotated their interior offensive linemen against Pittsburgh, with rookies like David Andrews and Shaq Mason performing really well. Carrying that forward to this road test in Buffalo against arguably the league’s best defense won’t be easy, but the smart play here is on the Patriots, and specifically Tom Brady. Typically, Brady performs well against Rex Ryan defenses; he may not diagnose every creative pressure package, but more often than not his quick release and pre-snap adjustments give him a leg up. For that reason I’m betting on a quiet day from Buffalo’s front seven.
Sack Opportunity Chart
Team | Team Defense | Team Offense | ||||||
Pressure | QB | QB | Drop Backs | Pressure | QB Sacks | QB Hits | Drop | |
Applied | Sacks | Hits | Faced | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed | Backs | |
2008 NFL Average | 12% | 2 | 4.1 | 34.3 | 12% | 2 | 4.1 | 34.3 |
2009 NFL Average | 13.3% | 2.2 | 4.7 | 35.4 | 13.3% | 2.2 | 4.7 | 35.4 |
2010 NFL Average | 12.7% | 2.2 | 4.6 | 35.9 | 12.8% | 2.2 | 4.6 | 35.9 |
2011 NFL Average | 13.1% | 2.3 | 4.8 | 36.3 | 13.1% | 2.3 | 4.8 | 36.3 |
2012 NFL Average | 12.8% | 2.3 | 4.8 | 37 | 12.8% | 2.3 | 4.8 | 37 |
2013 NFL Average | 13.5% | 2.5 | 5.1 | 38 | 13.5% | 2.5 | 5.1 | 38 |
2014 NFL Average | 13.7% | 2.4 | 5.1 | 37.3 | 13.7% | 2.4 | 5.1 | 37.3 |
2015 NFL Average | 10.6% | 2 | 3.9 | 36.8 | 10.6% | 2 | 3.9 | 36.8 |
Team | Team Defense | Team Offense | ||||||
Pressure | QB | QB | Drop Backs | Pressure | QB Sacks | QB Hits | Drop | |
Applied | Sacks | Hits | Faced | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed | Backs | |
ARIZONA Cardinals | 8% | 2 | 4 | 50 | 3.1% | 0 | 1 | 32 |
ATLANTA Falcons | 15.4% | 0 | 8 | 52 | 8.6% | 1 | 3 | 35 |
BALTIMORE Ravens | 11.4% | 4 | 5 | 44 | 26.5% | 2 | 9 | 34 |
BUFFALO Bills | 9.8% | 2 | 5 | 51 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 19 |
CAROLINA Panthers | 13.3% | 5 | 6 | 45 | 6.1% | 2 | 2 | 33 |
CHICAGO Bears | 0% | 0 | 0 | 23 | 13.2% | 2 | 5 | 38 |
CINCINNATI Bengals | 6.7% | 2 | 3 | 45 | 2.9% | 0 | 1 | 34 |
CLEVELAND Browns | 4.2% | 0 | 1 | 24 | 14.3% | 3 | 5 | 35 |
DALLAS Cowboys | 10.8% | 1 | 4 | 37 | 2.2% | 0 | 1 | 45 |
DENVER Broncos | 26.5% | 2 | 9 | 34 | 11.4% | 4 | 5 | 44 |
DETROIT Lions | 9.1% | 2 | 4 | 44 | 9.7% | 1 | 3 | 31 |
GREEN BAY Packers | 13.2% | 2 | 5 | 38 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 23 |
HOUSTON Texans | 8.6% | 2 | 3 | 35 | 9.6% | 5 | 5 | 52 |
INDIANAPOLIS Colts | 0% | 0 | 0 | 19 | 9.8% | 2 | 5 | 51 |
JACKSONVILLE Jaguars | 6.1% | 2 | 2 | 33 | 13.3% | 5 | 6 | 45 |
KANSAS CITY Chiefs | 9.6% | 5 | 5 | 52 | 8.6% | 2 | 3 | 35 |
MIAMI Dolphins | 3.1% | 1 | 1 | 32 | 10.8% | 3 | 4 | 37 |
MINNESOTA Vikings | 11.1% | 1 | 3 | 27 | 21.6% | 5 | 8 | 37 |
NEW ENGLAND Patriots | 12.2% | 3 | 5 | 41 | 5.9% | 2 | 2 | 34 |
NEW ORLEANS Saints | 3.1% | 0 | 1 | 32 | 8% | 2 | 4 | 50 |
NEW YORK Giants | 2.2% | 0 | 1 | 45 | 10.8% | 1 | 4 | 37 |
NEW YORK Jets | 14.3% | 3 | 5 | 35 | 4.2% | 0 | 1 | 24 |
OAKLAND Raiders | 2.9% | 0 | 1 | 34 | 6.7% | 2 | 3 | 45 |
PHILADELPHIA Eagles | 8.6% | 1 | 3 | 35 | 15.4% | 0 | 8 | 52 |
PITTSBURGH Steelers | 5.9% | 2 | 2 | 34 | 12.2% | 3 | 5 | 41 |
SAN DIEGO Chargers | 9.7% | 1 | 3 | 31 | 9.1% | 2 | 4 | 44 |
SAN FRANCISCO 49ers | 21.6% | 5 | 8 | 37 | 11.1% | 1 | 3 | 27 |
SEATTLE Seahawks | 24.1% | 2 | 7 | 29 | 19.1% | 6 | 9 | 47 |
ST. LOUIS Rams | 19.1% | 6 | 9 | 47 | 24.1% | 2 | 7 | 29 |
TAMPA BAY Buccaneers | 11.1% | 2 | 2 | 18 | 16.2% | 4 | 6 | 37 |
TENNESSEE Titans | 16.2% | 4 | 6 | 37 | 11.1% | 2 | 2 | 18 |
WASHINGTON | 10.8% | 3 | 4 | 37 | 3.1% | 1 | 1 | 32 |
Tackle Matchups to Exploit
Dallas defenders at Philadelphia
Even in a game the Eagles struggled to get out of the blocks, they still allowed an above average 52 tackle opportunities to Atlanta. Chip Kelly’s offense was forced out of its rhythm after a fast start by the Falcons; expect a similarly tight game this week, but don’t be surprised if the Eagles emphasise running the football. They ran the ball on only 23.5% of their Week 1 plays. That number should shoot up to 40% against Dallas, who looked vulnerable at times against the Giants. Sean Lee and Anthony Hitchens both make excellent plays this week.
New York Jets defenders at Indianapolis
The Colts offense will probably never perform as poorly for the rest of the season as they did against Buffalo. Nevertheless, with another AFC East defensive powerhouse coming to town, they will have to make some adjustments. Andrew Luck did not have his best game in western New York, but it is hard to keep a good quarterback down. A Monday night spotlight should fire up the Colts, despite T.Y. Hilton not being available. Luck is smart enough to get the ball out quickly and keep the offense on schedule.
Tackle Matchups to Avoid
Green Bay defenders vs. Seattle
The preseason concerns surrounding the Seahawks offense have carried forward into the regular season. In particular, their offensive line looks like a weak area that can be exploited. The Packers have decent pass rushers up front who should, in a rowdy Lambeau Field ‘revenge’ atmosphere, be able to cause Seattle problems. If you can avoid starting your Packers defenders, make the move.
Houston defenders at Carolina
Panthers head coach Ron Rivera is happy to win games ugly, and this contest with Houston will be no different. Is a Panthers offensive explosion likely, considering what Kansas City did to Houston? Not necessarily. This Panthers offense is living on the edge and could splutter at any time; this is not the recipe for fantasy success on the IDP side. Brian Cushing and J.J. Watt will get theirs, but trust other Texans at your own peril.
Tackle Opportunity Chart
Team | TEAM Defense | TEAM Offense | |||||||||
Tackle | Rush Attempts | Drop Backs | Offensive | Rush | Tackle Opps | Rush | Drop | Offensive | Rush | ||
Opportunity | Faced | Faced | Snaps Faced | Percentage | Allowed | Attempts | Backs | Snaps | Percentage | ||
2008 NFL Average | 49.3 | 27.6 | 34.3 | 61.9 | 54.8% | 49.3 | 27.6 | 34.3 | 61.9 | 54.8% | |
2009 NFL Average | 49.9 | 27.4 | 33.3 | 62.9 | 55.1% | 49.9 | 27.4 | 33.3 | 62.9 | 55.1% | |
2010 NFL Average | 49.9 | 27.2 | 35.9 | 63.1 | 54.5% | 49.9 | 27.2 | 35.9 | 63.1 | 54.3% | |
2011 NFL Average | 50 | 27.3 | 36.3 | 63.6 | 54.5% | 50 | 27.3 | 36.3 | 63.6 | 54.5% | |
2012 NFL Average | 50.6 | 27.2 | 37 | 64.2 | 53.7% | 50.6 | 27.2 | 37 | 64.2 | 53.7% | |
2013 NFL Average | 51.3 | 27.1 | 38 | 65 | 52.8% | 51.3 | 27.1 | 38 | 65 | 52.8% | |
2014 NFL Average | 51 | 26.7 | 37.3 | 64 | 52.5% | 51 | 26.7 | 37.3 | 64 | 52.5% | |
2015 NFL Average | 51.2 | 26.5 | 36.8 | 63.3 | 51.8% | 51.2 | 26.5 | 36.8 | 63.3 | 51.8% | |
Team | TEAM Defense | TEAM Offense | |||||||||
Tackle | Rush Attempts | Drop Backs | Offensive | Rush | Tackle Opps | Rush | Drop | Offensive | Rush | ||
Opportunity | Faced | Faced | Snaps Faced | Percentage | Allowed | Attempts | Backs | Snaps | Percentage | ||
ARIZONA Cardinals | 52 | 20 | 50 | 70 | 28.6% | 44 | 25 | 32 | 57 | 43.9% | |
ATLANTA Falcons | 52 | 16 | 52 | 68 | 23.5% | 59 | 35 | 35 | 70 | 50% | |
BALTIMORE Ravens | 53 | 25 | 44 | 69 | 36.2% | 43 | 23 | 34 | 57 | 40.4% | |
BUFFALO Bills | 45 | 17 | 51 | 68 | 25% | 50 | 36 | 19 | 55 | 65.5% | |
CAROLINA Panthers | 48 | 21 | 45 | 66 | 31.8% | 55 | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | |
CHICAGO Bears | 48 | 30 | 23 | 53 | 56.6% | 53 | 33 | 38 | 71 | 46.5% | |
CINCINNATI Bengals | 48 | 16 | 45 | 61 | 26.2% | 56 | 31 | 34 | 65 | 47.7% | |
CLEVELAND Browns | 51 | 36 | 24 | 60 | 60% | 49 | 28 | 35 | 63 | 44.4% | |
DALLAS Cowboys | 45 | 24 | 37 | 61 | 39.3% | 59 | 23 | 45 | 68 | 33.8% | |
DENVER Broncos | 43 | 23 | 34 | 57 | 40.4% | 53 | 25 | 44 | 69 | 36.2% | |
DETROIT Lions | 67 | 30 | 44 | 74 | 40.5% | 36 | 16 | 31 | 47 | 34% | |
GREEN BAY Packers | 53 | 33 | 38 | 71 | 46.5% | 48 | 30 | 23 | 53 | 56.6% | |
HOUSTON Texans | 56 | 32 | 35 | 67 | 47.8% | 52 | 21 | 52 | 73 | 28.8% | |
INDIANAPOLIS Colts | 50 | 36 | 19 | 55 | 65.5% | 45 | 17 | 51 | 68 | 25% | |
JACKSONVILLE Jaguars | 55 | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | 48 | 21 | 45 | 66 | 31.8% | |
KANSAS CITY Chiefs | 52 | 21 | 52 | 73 | 28.8% | 56 | 32 | 35 | 67 | 47.8% | |
MIAMI Dolphins | 59 | 37 | 32 | 69 | 53.6% | 43 | 18 | 37 | 55 | 32.7% | |
MINNESOTA Vikings | 57 | 39 | 27 | 66 | 59.1% | 45 | 17 | 37 | 54 | 31.5% | |
NEW ENGLAND Patriots | 54 | 25 | 41 | 66 | 37.9% | 51 | 24 | 34 | 58 | 41.4% | |
NEW ORLEANS Saints | 44 | 25 | 32 | 57 | 43.9% | 52 | 20 | 50 | 70 | 28.6% | |
NEW YORK Giants | 59 | 23 | 45 | 68 | 33.8% | 45 | 24 | 37 | 61 | 39.3% | |
NEW YORK Jets | 49 | 28 | 35 | 63 | 44.4% | 51 | 36 | 24 | 60 | 60% | |
OAKLAND Raiders | 56 | 31 | 34 | 65 | 47.7% | 48 | 16 | 45 | 61 | 26.2% | |
PHILADELPHIA Eagles | 59 | 35 | 35 | 70 | 50% | 52 | 16 | 52 | 68 | 23.5% | |
PITTSBURGH Steelers | 51 | 24 | 34 | 58 | 41.4% | 54 | 25 | 41 | 66 | 37.9% | |
SAN DIEGO Chargers | 36 | 16 | 31 | 47 | 34% | 67 | 30 | 44 | 74 | 40.5% | |
SAN FRANCISCO 49ers | 45 | 17 | 37 | 54 | 31.5% | 57 | 39 | 27 | 66 | 59.1% | |
SEATTLE Seahawks | 46 | 26 | 29 | 55 | 47.3% | 70 | 32 | 47 | 79 | 40.5% | |
ST. LOUIS Rams | 70 | 32 | 47 | 79 | 40.5% | 46 | 26 | 29 | 55 | 47.3% | |
TAMPA BAY Buccaneers | 47 | 32 | 18 | 50 | 64% | 46 | 26 | 37 | 63 | 41.3% | |
TENNESSEE Titans | 46 | 26 | 37 | 63 | 41.3% | 47 | 32 | 18 | 50 | 64% | |
WASHINGTON | 43 | 18 | 37 | 55 | 32.7 | 59 | 37 | 32 | 69 | 53.6% |
Best of luck with Week 2 and make sure to check back next week for more matchup analysis.
If you have any further questions or tricky line-up decisions you need advice with, please drop me a line at
larkin@footballguys.com, or if you prefer you can tweet me @davlar87.