Matchup Analysis: Los Angeles Chargers at New England Patriots
Vegas Prediction
Vegas says: Chargers 22, Patriots 25
FBG Projections
Team | Rush | Yards | TD | Comp | Att | Pass Yd | TD | INT |
LAC | 26 | 105 | 0.6 | 23 | 34 | 252 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
NE | 29 | 118 | 1.0 | 24 | 36 | 265 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
Los Angeles Chargers Offense: overview
| Points (vs AVG) (rank) | Rush Yards (vs AVG) (rank) | Pass Yards (vs AVG) (rank) |
Chargers Offense | 26.5 (+3.3) (7) | 115 (+1) (16) | 250 (+12) (14) |
Patriots Defense | 20.3 (-3.0) (6) | 113 (-1) (12) | 246 (+9) (22) |
New England Patriots Offense: overview
| Points (vs AVG) (rank) | Rush Yards (vs AVG) (rank) | Pass Yards (vs AVG) (rank) |
Patriots Offense | 27.2 (+4.0) (4) | 127 (+13) (5) | 266 (+28) (8) |
Chargers Defense | 20.4 (-2.9) (7) | 105 (-9) (9) | 223 (-14) (8) |
Chargers Rushing offense
Good matchup vs. the Patriots defense.
The Chargers ground game floundered in a tough matchup with the Ravens last week, amassing just 89 rushing yards from 33 total attempts for an average of 2.7 rushing yards per attempt. Melvin Gordon saw his heaviest workload since returning from injury with 18 rushing attempts, but his injury woes continued as he suffered another knee injury--this time on the left side, during last week’s contest. Gordon played through the injury but was clearly hampered by it. He is reportedly dealing with a sprain similar to the injury suffered to his left knee earlier this season, but Gordon is expected to play through it this week and will undoubtedly be at less than 100 percent. Gordon has yet to top 50 rushing yards since his return from injury, but he remains a threat to score one or more touchdowns given how the Chargers use him. Austin Ekeler will almost certainly be in for an increased role with Gordon banged up. While dealing with a groin injury himself, Ekeler played in Week 17 and looked to be near 100 percent with his 11 carries last week. With his receiving upside and proven effectiveness on the ground (averaged 5.2 yards per rush attempt), Ekeler should be set up for success this week. The offensive line for Los Angeles remains healthy and should also be able to hold their own in this one.
The Patriots run defense has fared relatively well against running backs for most of the season, finishing 2018 allowing 112.7 rushing yards per game (11th-fewest) and only seven rushing touchdowns (2nd-fewest). From an efficiency perspective, however, the Patriots have certainly allowed their fair share of chunk gains as they rank 29th, giving up an average of 4.9 rushing yards per attempt. A weak schedule against the run can help explain their limited overall rushing yardage allowed, as facing running backs from the Bills, Dolphins, and Jets twice will certainly prop up any defense’s numbers. The New England front seven is far from a strength, as interior lineman Malcom Brown underperformed this season while their linebackers have been just mediocre overall. Poor choice of the defensive scheme along with limited help from the secondary also helps explain their inefficiency, as tackling has been a problem for this unit at times throughout the year while lining up in a lot of nickel and dime looks has sacrificed personnel up front. The extra help in run defense will be needed this week against a stout Chargers offensive line, and while Gordon is less than 100 percent, Ekeler offers plenty of big-play upside as we have seen throughout the 2018 season.
Chargers Passing offense
Neutral matchup vs. the Patriots defense.
Philip Rivers had a forgettable outing in his playoff win last week as the Chargers offense struggled to maintain drives against a strong Ravens defense. The ground game never got going while Chargers receivers had a tough time getting open against tough coverage. The Ravens effectively shut down Rivers in both meetings last season, but those rough outings were few and far between throughout the regular season. Rivers had one of the best regular seasons of his career and has consistently played well on the road leading the Chargers to an 8-1 road record. Keenan Allen should continue to be his top target out of the slot while Mike Williams should draw the best matchup amongst these wide receivers. Williams was targeted deep a couple times last week and has been the best big-play threat on this offense, finishing the regular season with the highest touchdown-to-target percentage amongst receivers with at least 50 targets. Tight end Hunter Henry could also make his season debut this week after being activated from the injured reserve list this week. Henry has been sidelined all season with a knee injury, but would serve as an upgrade at the tight end position to compliment Antonio Gates. With their top running back banged up, this week could be much more pass-heavy with Henry’s return very well-timed.
The Patriots defense has been impressive against the pass for most of this season. They got off to a slow start with some forgettable outings leading up to Week 8, but since then, this defense has yet to allow a quarterback to pass for more than 276 yards in a game with quarterbacks scoring the 10th-fewest fantasy points per game (16.2) against them. The man-heavy coverage approach has worked well, for the most part, with Stefon Gilmore excelling as one of the top cornerbacks in football this season. Gilmore finished the regular season owning the highest forced incompletion percentage at his position--an accolade any cornerback would strive for. Jason McCourty has also been a tough matchup out the slot and should cause plenty of headaches for Keenan Allen. With Gilmore expected to cover Tyrell Williams in three-receiver sets, it may be Mike Williams with the best matchup against rookie J.C. Jackson. When the Chargers line up in 12 personnel, however, Gilmore’s focus should be on Mike Williams. This secondary has been up and down against tight ends, but overall, they have struggled against any reasonably talented tight end they have faced--including the likes of Trey Burton, Travis Kelce, Eric Ebron, and even allowing a touchdown to Vance McDonald in Week 15. Hunter Henry’s return could be well-timed against this unit that has given up some big games to the position.
Patriots Rushing offense
Neutral matchup vs. the Chargers defense.
The Patriots may not have sported the most productive rushing offense this season (ranked 20th with 4.3 yards per attempt), but they relied heavily on their ground game to the tune of 478 rushing attempts (third-most) and 2037 rushing yards (fifth-most). Rookie running back Sony Michel was the clear leader of this backfield when healthy, rushing 209 times for 931 yards with no other Patriots player having even half as much production on the ground. He saw double-digit carries in all 12 full games in which he played, rushing for over 100 yards in four of those outings. Michel offers a welcomed level of consistency to what has historically been one of the most unpredictable backfields in football. With that, this is still the Patriots. Among their other healthy three running backs, Rex Burkhead is next in line for carries as he closed out the season with a 13-carry game in Week 16 along with at least four carries in every other game since his return from injury. James White also continues to mix in as he has seen six or more carries in three of the last seven games since Michel’s return from injury, but it is clear that his talents lie as a pass-catcher rather than a runner. The Patriots offensive line has been average, at best, this season while this rushing offense certainly has the volatility to become very game-script dependent with Michel’s snaps getting absorbed by White in case this becomes a shootout.
The Chargers virtually shut down the Ravens offense for much of last week’s game as Ravens running backs managed just 36 rushing yards from 14 attempts. Lamar Jackson had some big runs, but Tom Brady will present no such threat this week. Do not let last week give the wrong impression of this defense, however, as they had a tough time against the run to close out the season. This defense has personnel much more suited for stopping the pass with their elite defensive backs and a pair of the best edge rushers in football. They lost both primary run-stoppers in middle linebacker Denzel Perryman and tackle Corey Liuget during the back half of the season, leaving a big hole in the middle of that defense with safety Derwin James being forced up into more of a linebacker position to pick up the slack on running downs. Their talent on the edges is undeniable, however, and while both Bosa and Ingram are known for their pass-rushing, they can each be effective against the run. This defense has certainly bent against the run, but they have yet to fully break this season and still should present a challenge even for a strong Patriots offensive line and ground game.
Patriots Passing offense
Tough matchup vs. the Chargers defense.
Tom Brady had a rocky 2018 season by his standards, finishing with his lowest touchdown total and the highest number of interceptions in a full 16-game season since 2013. He has been in particularly rough form to close out the season. Aside from an encouraging four-touchdown performance in Week 17 against the Jets, Brady had managed to pass for multiple touchdowns just twice from Weeks 8 to 16. Touchdowns aside, however, and Brady has still managed to post solid numbers in 2018--including an average of 272 passing yards per game and 7.7 passing yards per attempt, ranking him within the top-10 in both categories. The rest of this Patriots passing offense has been wildly inconsistent. Rob Gronkowski missed over four games worth of time due to injuries and finished with more than three receptions in just one of his final eight games to close out the season. His three touchdowns match a career-low, and his 52.5 receiving yards per game is his second-lowest mark only to his rookie season in 2010. Julian Edelman has been the most consistent receiving option with touchdowns in three of his last four games of the season with 69 or more yards in all four games, but Chris Hogan, on the other hand, has finished with a zero stat line in four of his last eight games to close out the year. James White remains a key weapon out of the backfield, but his workload has become game-script dependent with Sony Michel seeing most snaps if the Patriots are leading.
The Chargers took full advantage of facing a rookie quarterback last week as they held Lamar Jackson to just 25 passing yards and a zero passer rating with five sacks through three quarters before Jackson nearly mounted a comeback in the fourth quarter. This week, they face a near polar-opposite situation against one of the league’s most seasoned quarterbacks in Tom Brady. This defense is loaded with talent to defend against the pass, starting with a stacked secondary with the ability to lock down all areas of the field. Desmond King II has been one of the league’s best slot cornerback and should give Julian Edelman a tough time, while Derwin James, as a rookie, was one of the best safeties in the football. Casey Hayward was a top coverage cornerback last season and continued that high-level play this season despite a slight drop-off from 2017. Chris Hogan is expected to see shadow coverage from Hayward, giving him a tough matchup as well. The only possible weak link to be noted here would be opposite Hayward with Michael Davis, but even he has been above average at times with an elevated target load due to the lock-down play from King and Hayward. Phillip Dorsett should see most snaps against Davis in what is a neutral, at best, individual matchup. Rob Gronkowski will also draw tough coverage from Derwin James, and Tom Brady should have plenty of pressure in his face from this defense that racked up seven sacks last week. Led by the edge rushing duo of Joey Bosa and Melvin Ingram, the Chargers front seven can be very tough to deal and could be a big factor against a Tom Brady, who has been noticeably hampered by a strong pass-rush in the past.
Patriots vs QB
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 20 (+0.7) | 20 (+0.7) | 20 (+0.4) | 19 (+0.4) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 7 (-4.0) | 7 (-4.1) | 6 (-4.3) | 6 (-4.6) |
WEEK | PLAYER | oSNAP | CMP | ATT | YD | TD | INT | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Ben Roethlisberger | 64 | 22 | 34 | 235 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -3 | 0 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 15.1 | 15.1 |
16 | Josh Allen | 61 | 20 | 41 | 217 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 15.9 | 15.9 | 13.7 | 13.7 |
17 | Sam Darnold | 56 | 16 | 28 | 167 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 11.2 | 11.2 | 7.5 | 8.5 |
Philip Rivers
(FanDuel: $7300, DraftKings: $5700)
| | oSNAP | CMP | ATT | YD | TD | INT | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 63 | 23 | 37 | 181 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 5.3 | 5.3 |
17 | @ DEN | 49 | 14 | 24 | 176 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
18 | @ BAL | 73 | 22 | 32 | 160 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.9 | 9.9 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 23 | 34 | 252 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 (H=38) | 17.5 (H=49) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 22 | 34 | 256 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 17.8 | 17.8 | 17.8 (H=40) | 17.8 (H=51) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 24 | 33 | 249 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 1 | 1 | 0.1 | 18.9 | 18.9 | 18.9 (H=44) | 18.9 (H=57) |
Patriots vs RB
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 12 (-1.0) | 12 (-0.8) | 11 (-1.2) | 11 (-1.1) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 4 (-6.3) | 3 (-8.2) | 3 (-8.2) | 3 (-8.7) |
WEEK | PLAYER | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Jaylen Samuels | 39 | 19 | 142 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 17.2 | 19.2 | 18.2 | 22.2 |
15 | Stevan Ridley | 6 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
16 | Keith Ford | 30 | 7 | 33 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 4.7 | 6.7 | 5.7 | 6.7 |
16 | LeSean McCoy | 31 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 1.9 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 4.9 |
17 | Elijah McGuire | 43 | 18 | 41 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 7.5 |
17 | DeAngelo Henderson | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 1.9 | -0.1 | 0.9 |
Melvin Gordon
(FanDuel: $7400, DraftKings: $6200)
| | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 42 | 12 | 41 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 11.4 | 14.4 | 12.9 | 14.4 |
17 | @ DEN | 32 | 10 | 42 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 8.1 | 9.6 |
18 | @ BAL | 32 | 17 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 10.3 | 11.3 | 10.8 | 11.3 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 15 | 64 | 0.5 | | 3 | 26 | 0.1 | 12.6 | 15.6 | 14.1 (H=26) | 15.6 (H=37) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 15 | 70 | 0.6 | | 3 | 23 | 0.1 | 13.5 | 16.5 | 15.0 (H=29) | 16.5 (H=41) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 14 | 55 | 0.5 | | 3 | 23 | 0.2 | 12 | 15 | 13.5 (H=24) | 15.0 (H=35) |
Austin Ekeler
(FanDuel: $6200, DraftKings: $4500)
| | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
17 | @ DEN | 15 | 8 | 58 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.8 |
18 | @ BAL | 39 | 11 | 29 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 4.3 | 8.3 | 6.3 | 8.3 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 5 | 25 | 0.1 | | 3 | 21 | 0.1 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 7.3 (H=10) | 8.8 (H=19) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 3 | 16 | 0.1 | | 3 | 24 | 0.1 | 5.2 | 8.2 | 6.7 (H=8) | 8.2 (H=17) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 7 | 29 | 0.2 | | 3 | 20 | 0.2 | 7.3 | 10.3 | 8.8 (H=13) | 10.3 (H=25) |
Justin Jackson
(FanDuel: $4700, DraftKings: $3800)
| | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 21 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 47 | 0 | 4.6 | 11.6 | 8.1 | 11.6 |
17 | @ DEN | 12 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
18 | @ BAL | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 3 | 10 | 0 | | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 2.1 (H=1) | 2.6 (H=2) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 2 | 9 | 0 | | 2 | 12 | 0 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 3.1 (H=3) | 4.1 (H=6) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 3 | 13 | 0 | | 1 | 7 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 3.1 (H=3) | 3.6 (H=4) |
Patriots vs WR
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 11 (-0.6) | 14 (-0.1) | 11 (-0.5) | 13 (-0.4) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 13 (-2.2) | 14 (-1.1) | 12 (-1.7) | 13 (-2.1) |
WEEK | PLAYER | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Antonio Brown | 61 | 7 | 4 | 49 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.9 | 14.9 | 12.9 | 14.9 |
15 | James Washington | 44 | 4 | 3 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 8.0 | 9.5 |
16 | Zay Jones | 61 | 9 | 5 | 67 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.7 | 17.7 | 15.2 | 17.7 |
16 | Robert Foster | 59 | 7 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.2 | 9.2 | 7.2 | 9.2 |
17 | Deontay Burnett | 30 | 5 | 5 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | 12.3 | 9.8 | 12.3 |
17 | Andre Roberts | 40 | 4 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 5.8 |
Keenan Allen
(FanDuel: $7100, DraftKings: $6400)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 59 | 8 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.8 | 10.8 | 8.3 | 10.8 |
17 | @ DEN | 45 | 7 | 4 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.4 | 10.4 | 8.4 | 10.4 |
18 | @ BAL | 64 | 6 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.7 | 7.7 | 5.7 | 7.7 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 6 | 68 | 0.3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8.8 | 14.8 | 11.8 (H=20) | 14.8 (H=33) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 6 | 68 | 0.3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8.8 | 14.8 | 11.8 (H=20) | 14.8 (H=33) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 6 | 68 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.8 | 15.8 | 12.8 (H=23) | 15.8 (H=37) |
Mike Williams
(FanDuel: $6600, DraftKings: $4700)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 40 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 |
17 | @ DEN | 27 | 6 | 5 | 65 | 1 | 1 | -11 | 0 | 11.4 | 16.4 | 13.9 | 16.4 |
18 | @ BAL | 55 | 5 | 2 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 6.2 | 7.2 | 8.2 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 3 | 44 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | 9.2 | 7.7 (H=10) | 9.2 (H=19) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 3 | 38 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.6 | 8.6 | 7.1 (H=9) | 8.6 (H=17) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 3 | 44 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.8 | 9.8 | 8.3 (H=11) | 9.8 (H=22) |
Tyrell Williams
(FanDuel: $4900, DraftKings: $3900)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 58 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.2 |
17 | @ DEN | 41 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 4.3 |
18 | @ BAL | 52 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 2.9 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 2 | 30 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 6.2 | 5.2 (H=7) | 6.2 (H=12) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 2 | 34 | 0.2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.8 | 6.8 | 5.8 (H=8) | 6.8 (H=14) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 2 | 19 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 (H=3) | 4.5 (H=6) |
Travis Benjamin
(FanDuel: $4600, DraftKings: $3400)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 21 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
17 | @ DEN | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
18 | @ BAL | 16 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 4.1 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 1 | 17 | 0.1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 3.1 (H=3) | 3.6 (H=5) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 1 | 18 | 0.1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 3.3 (H=3) | 3.8 (H=5) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 2 | 27 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 4.3 (H=5) | 5.3 (H=10) |
Patriots vs TE
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 20 (+0.8) | 17 (+0.7) | 18 (+0.6) | 17 (+0.8) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 15 (-1.3) | 14 (-2.4) | 14 (-2.5) | 14 (-2.8) |
WEEK | PLAYER | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Vance McDonald | 23 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 7.3 | 9.3 | 8.3 | 9.3 |
16 | Jason Croom | 44 | 6 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 5.5 | 9.5 | 5.5 | 8.5 |
17 | Chris Herndon | 46 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
Hunter Henry
(FanDuel: $4900, DraftKings: $2800)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 2 | 20 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 4.6 | 3.6 (H=3) | 4.6 (H=10) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 1 | 14 | 0.1 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 (H=1) | 3.0 (H=4) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 3 | 31 | 0.3 | 4.9 | 7.9 | 6.4 (H=10) | 7.9 (H=25) |
Antonio Gates
(FanDuel: $4900, DraftKings: $3200)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 42 | 5 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 2.1 | 5.1 | 1.6 | 4.1 |
17 | @ DEN | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
18 | @ BAL | 33 | 4 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 3.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 | 7.5 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 1 | 13 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 2.4 (H=1) | 2.9 (H=3) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 1 | 16 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 2.7 (H=2) | 3.2 (H=4) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 1 | 8 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.9 (H=1) | 2.4 (H=2) |
Virgil Green
(FanDuel: $4100, DraftKings: $2500)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 29 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 3.2 |
17 | @ DEN | 47 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
18 | @ BAL | 44 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | -0.7 | 0.8 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.2 (H=0) | 1.7 (H=2) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.2 (H=0) | 1.7 (H=2) |
Patriots vs PK
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 6T (-0.1) | 6T (-0.1) | 15T (-0.1) | (+0.0) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 6 (-1.9) | 6 (-1.9) | 8T (-1.7) | (+0.0) |
WEEK | PLAYER | FG | FGA | XP | XPA | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Chris Boswell | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
16 | Steve Hauschka | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
17 | Jason Myers | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Mike Badgley
(FanDuel: $--, DraftKings: $--)
| | FG | FGA | XP | XPA | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
17 | @ DEN | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
18 | @ BAL | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 19.0 | 19.0 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 7 | 7 | 8.1 | 8.1 |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | 1.6 | 2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
Patriots vs TD
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 7T (-2.8) | 7T (-2.8) | 3 (-3.6) | 3 (-3.6) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 7 (-2.5) | 7 (-2.5) | 8T (-2.7) | 8T (-2.7) |
WEEK | PLAYER | PT | YD | SACK | INT | FR | SFTY | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 10 | 368 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
16 | Buffalo Bills | 24 | 390 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
17 | New York Jets | 38 | 375 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Los Angeles Chargers
(FanDuel: $4300, DraftKings: $2400)
| | PT | YD | SACK | INT | FR | SFTY | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BAL | 22.00 | 361 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
17 | @ DEN | 9.00 | 370 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21.0 | 21.0 |
18 | @ BAL | 17.00 | 229 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 | 14.0 | 14.0 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | 25.30 | 388 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 (H=15) | 7.5 (H=27) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | 25.25 | 386 | 2.4 | 1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.4 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.3 (H=18) | 8.3 (H=32) |
Chargers vs QB
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 7 (-2.1) | 7 (-2.1) | 8 (-1.9) | 6 (-2.6) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 17 (+0.9) | 17 (+0.9) | 16 (+0.1) | 15 (-0.1) |
WEEK | PLAYER | oSNAP | CMP | ATT | YD | TD | INT | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Patrick Mahomes | 60 | 24 | 34 | 243 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 20.5 | 20.5 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
16 | Lamar Jackson | 62 | 12 | 22 | 204 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 39 | 0 | 18.1 | 18.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 |
17 | Case Keenum | 79 | 31 | 48 | 292 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 18.4 | 18.4 | 13.5 | 14.5 |
18 | Lamar Jackson | 61 | 14 | 29 | 194 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 54 | 0 | 22.1 | 22.1 | 18.2 | 19.2 |
Tom Brady
(FanDuel: $8200, DraftKings: $5600)
| | oSNAP | CMP | ATT | YD | TD | INT | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 66 | 13 | 24 | 126 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
17 | vs NYJ | 64 | 24 | 33 | 250 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 26.0 | 26.0 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 24 | 36 | 265 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1 | 3 | 0.1 | 20.5 | 20.5 | 20.5 (H=45) | 20.5 (H=66) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 24 | 36 | 265 | 1.6 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0.1 | 19.8 | 19.8 | 19.8 (H=42) | 19.8 (H=62) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 24 | 33 | 243 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.6 | 18.6 | 18.6 (H=38) | 18.6 (H=56) |
Chargers vs RB
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 18 (+0.5) | 23 (+1.6) | 21 (+0.9) | 20 (+1.2) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 20 (+2.0) | 26 (+4.3) | 21 (+2.5) | 24 (+3.1) |
WEEK | PLAYER | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Damien Williams | 44 | 10 | 49 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 74 | 0 | 24.3 | 30.3 | 27.3 | 30.3 |
15 | Darrel Williams | 15 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 9.2 | 11.2 | 10.2 | 11.2 |
16 | Gus Edwards | 23 | 14 | 92 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 11.0 | 11.5 |
16 | Kenneth Dixon | 29 | 8 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 4.8 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 5.8 |
17 | Royce Freeman | 44 | 17 | 60 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 43 | 0 | 10.3 | 18.3 | 14.3 | 18.3 |
17 | Andy Janovich | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 1 | 9.0 | 11.0 | 10.0 | 11.0 |
18 | Kenneth Dixon | 32 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 53 | 0 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 6.1 | 8.6 |
18 | Gus Edwards | 21 | 8 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
Sony Michel
(FanDuel: $6600, DraftKings: $4700)
| | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 23 | 18 | 116 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 20.6 |
17 | vs NYJ | 25 | 14 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 17 | 69 | 0.5 | | 1 | 6 | 0 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 11.0 (H=19) | 11.5 (H=29) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 15 | 64 | 0.4 | | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 9.0 (H=13) | 9.0 (H=19) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 16 | 71 | 0.5 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 10.1 (H=16) | 10.1 (H=23) |
James White
(FanDuel: $7400, DraftKings: $4900)
| | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 29 | 8 | 41 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 11.4 | 13.4 | 12.4 | 13.4 |
17 | vs NYJ | 27 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 39 | 1 | 12.9 | 16.9 | 14.9 | 16.9 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 4 | 18 | 0.2 | | 5 | 39 | 0.4 | 9.3 | 14.3 | 11.8 (H=19) | 14.3 (H=40) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 4 | 18 | 0.2 | | 5 | 41 | 0.3 | 8.9 | 13.9 | 11.4 (H=18) | 13.9 (H=38) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 4 | 15 | 0.3 | | 5 | 41 | 0.4 | 9.8 | 14.8 | 12.3 (H=20) | 14.8 (H=43) |
Rex Burkhead
(FanDuel: $5500, DraftKings: $3600)
| | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 25 | 13 | 39 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 7.9 | 11.9 | 7.9 | 10.9 |
17 | vs NYJ | 17 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 9.2 | 10.2 | 9.7 | 10.2 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 5 | 21 | 0.1 | | 2 | 16 | 0.1 | 4.9 | 6.9 | 5.9 (H=7) | 6.9 (H=15) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 6 | 24 | 0.2 | | 3 | 20 | 0.1 | 6.2 | 9.2 | 7.7 (H=12) | 9.2 (H=25) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 5 | 28 | 0.2 | | 2 | 13 | 0.1 | 5.9 | 7.9 | 6.9 (H=10) | 7.9 (H=19) |
James Develin
(FanDuel: $4800, DraftKings: $3000)
| | oSNAP | RSH | YD | TD | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
17 | vs NYJ | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 (H=0) | 0.6 (H=0) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | 1 | 5 | 0 | | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.5 (H=0) | 2.0 (H=2) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 (H=0) | 0.0 (H=0) |
Chargers vs WR
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 7 (-3.7) | 5 (-5.7) | 7 (-4.6) | 7 (-5.8) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 5 (-6.4) | 4 (-10.6) | 3 (-9.7) | 2 (-12.1) |
WEEK | PLAYER | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Demarcus Robinson | 36 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 8.7 |
15 | Tyreek Hill | 53 | 7 | 4 | 46 | 0 | 3 | -5 | 0 | 4.1 | 8.1 | 6.1 | 8.1 |
16 | John Brown | 34 | 6 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.7 |
16 | Michael Crabtree | 43 | 4 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 |
17 | DaeSean Hamilton | 73 | 8 | 5 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.9 | 9.9 | 7.4 | 9.9 |
17 | Tim Patrick | 56 | 7 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.8 | 8.8 | 4.8 | 7.8 |
18 | Michael Crabtree | 51 | 4 | 2 | 38 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.8 | 17.8 | 16.8 | 17.8 |
18 | Willie Snead | 51 | 6 | 3 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 8.0 |
Julian Edelman
(FanDuel: $7600, DraftKings: $6300)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 58 | 10 | 6 | 70 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 19 | 16.0 | 19.0 |
17 | vs NYJ | 58 | 6 | 5 | 69 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 15.3 | 20.3 | 17.8 | 20.3 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 7 | 79 | 0.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 11.2 | 18.2 | 14.7 (H=27) | 18.2 (H=48) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 7 | 86 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.2 | 19.2 | 15.7 (H=31) | 19.2 (H=53) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 7 | 74 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.4 | 17.4 | 13.9 (H=25) | 17.4 (H=44) |
Chris Hogan
(FanDuel: $5500, DraftKings: $3900)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
17 | vs NYJ | 64 | 11 | 6 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.4 | 12.4 | 9.4 | 12.4 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 3 | 36 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.8 | 7.8 | 6.3 (H=8) | 7.8 (H=17) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 2 | 24 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 4.0 (H=4) | 5.0 (H=8) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 3 | 32 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.4 | 7.4 | 5.9 (H=7) | 7.4 (H=16) |
Cordarrelle Patterson
(FanDuel: $5200, DraftKings: $3500)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 17 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 66 | 0 | 6.9 | 7.9 | 7.4 | 7.9 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 2 | 22 | 0.2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3.8 | 5.8 | 4.8 (H=5) | 5.8 (H=12) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 2 | 26 | 0.2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4.1 | 6.1 | 5.1 (H=6) | 6.1 (H=13) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 2 | 23 | 0.2 | 2 | 9 | 0.1 | 5 | 7 | 6.0 (H=8) | 7.0 (H=16) |
Phillip Dorsett
(FanDuel: $4600, DraftKings: $3800)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | RSH | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
17 | vs NYJ | 39 | 5 | 5 | 34 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 11 | 16 | 13.5 | 16.0 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 2 | 20 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.6 | 4.6 | 3.6 (H=3) | 4.6 (H=7) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 1 | 16 | 0.1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 2.9 (H=2) | 3.4 (H=4) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 3 | 35 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.7 | 7.7 | 6.2 (H=10) | 7.7 (H=18) |
Chargers vs TE
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 13 (-1.0) | 14 (-1.0) | 13 (-1.0) | 14 (-1.0) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 21 (+1.3) | 21 (+2.5) | 21 (+2.0) | 21 (+2.4) |
WEEK | PLAYER | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Travis Kelce | 60 | 9 | 7 | 61 | 0 | 6.1 | 13.1 | 9.6 | 13.1 |
16 | Mark Andrews | 20 | 2 | 2 | 83 | 1 | 14.3 | 16.3 | 15.3 | 16.3 |
17 | Matt LaCosse | 62 | 8 | 5 | 33 | 0 | 3.3 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 8.3 |
18 | Mark Andrews | 28 | 7 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 3.1 | 6.1 | 4.6 | 6.1 |
Rob Gronkowski
(FanDuel: $6200, DraftKings: $4600)
| | oSNAP | TARG | REC | YD | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 59 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
17 | vs NYJ | 55 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 3.4 | 4.4 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | | | 4 | 46 | 0.4 | 7 | 11 | 9.0 (H=14) | 11.0 (H=27) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | | | 4 | 46 | 0.3 | 6.4 | 10.4 | 8.4 (H=12) | 10.4 (H=25) |
19 | PROJ-Bloom | | | 2 | 25 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 6.3 | 5.3 (H=5) | 6.3 (H=10) |
Chargers vs PK
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 7 (-0.8) | 7 (-0.8) | 5 (-1.1) | (+0.0) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 10 (-1.0) | 10 (-1.0) | 10 (-1.4) | (+0.0) |
WEEK | PLAYER | FG | FGA | XP | XPA | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Harrison Butker | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
16 | Justin Tucker | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
17 | Brandon McManus | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
18 | Justin Tucker | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Stephen Gostkowski
(FanDuel: $--, DraftKings: $--)
| | FG | FGA | XP | XPA | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
17 | vs NYJ | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | 1.8 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 9.4 | 9.4 |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 9.6 | 9.6 |
Chargers vs TD
| STANDARD | PPR | FD | DK |
Season FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 11T (-0.6) | 11T (-0.6) | 9 (-1.1) | 9 (-1.1) |
Last 4 weeks FPPG allowed rank (vs AVG) | 30 (+4.6) | 30 (+4.6) | 26 (+3.4) | 26 (+3.4) |
WEEK | PLAYER | PT | YD | SACK | INT | FR | SFTY | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
15 | Kansas City Chiefs | 29 | 407 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
16 | Baltimore Ravens | 10 | 198 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 22 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
17 | Denver Broncos | 23 | 276 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
18 | Baltimore Ravens | 23 | 243 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
New England Patriots
(FanDuel: $4700, DraftKings: $2600)
| | PT | YD | SACK | INT | FR | SFTY | TD | STD | PPR | FD | DK |
16 | vs BUF | 12.00 | 289 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
17 | vs NYJ | 3.00 | 239 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 22 | 23.0 | 23.0 |
19 | PROJ-Dodds | 21.30 | 366 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.5 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 (H=19) | 9.2 (H=35) |
19 | PROJ-Tremblay | 21.25 | 361 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.5 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 (H=21) | 9.6 (H=38) |