Photo: Imagn Images

Over the past few years, there have been two very popular articles written by our very own Chase Stuart that look at an interesting approach to building a fantasy team with late value picks. Based upon the theory of using both Strength of Schedule ("SOS") and taking two players as a combination to build one very good player, he has discussed both Team Defense by Committee ("TDBC") and Quarterback by Committee ("QBBC") as a general fantasy league strategy. In general I think that this is a wise move because very early on in fantasy drafts there are a ton of RB and WR prospects to go after to build a great team. While there are a few studs at QB and also a few choice defenses, I do not see a huge need in leagues to pursue either too hard in the beginning stages of a fantasy draft.

So with this in mind, I started to think about what else can be done with the committee approach. Tight end? Perhaps. Wide receiver? A possibility, but it might be better to look at third WR options than any other option. What about running back? Hmmm, that's really intriguing. What if you could grab two running backs later in the draft that could combine to perform on a RB2 - or even RB1 - level, based solely on their current projections and their schedule? Now we're talking. This really got my attention, so I went after this one first. Let's take a look at how I went about this and then we can digest and discuss the results.

THE GROUND(GAME) RULES

So how to begin? Defenses and quarterbacks are relatively easy to "committee" together. There's usually only one QB and certainly only one team defense per NFL club, so the approach is pretty simple as far as picking out which players / teams to try and pair up. When it comes to running backs, the line is not quite so easy to draw, but I needed some basis to pick which players it made sense to try and combine for a decent committee. I decided that I would use the following criteria to decide which players to start with for evaluating:

CRITERIA #1 - RB25 AND BEYOND

This seems pretty simple. If we want to have a duo that puts up RB2 numbers, that means we want RB24 or better production - else we would just draft RB24 (Jeremy Hill) or higher and forget the whole idea. So here is the list of players with which I started, based on their Average Draft Position (ADP):

Table 1: Running Backs RB25-RB50 Based on PPR ADP

Great, now we have 26 guys to pair up and see how they do. That makes 325 potential committees, so there had better be a decent one (or several, we hope) out of all of those couplets. Now, before I go over the method of how to pair them up and the results, we need one more rule:

CRITERIA #2 - NO MORE THAN ONE RB FROM ROUND 5 AND ONE FROM ROUND 6

This could get tricky here, but understand the overall goal. The point of RB2BC is to "free up" the first four rounds of your fantasy draft to pursue three receivers (especially in PPR leagues) after grabbing a stud RB in Round 1. This also gives you the flexibility of grabbing two receivers and a stud QB or TE, depending on your personal preference, or even to get RB2 and have the "RB2BC" be your RB3. Flexibility is the name of the game here. We all want value in our drafts, and having the ability to grab two RBs in Rounds 5 and 6 to act as our RB2BC gives us that ability.

Here is the good news - all the running backs on the list above has an ADP that is Round 6 or higher (later). It might even be possible to push this into a Round 6 and Round 7 RB pair.  We will have to keep that goal in mind when we look at the results because it would not make sense to expect to get two Round 6 running backs in one of these combinations based on their ADP.

So what do we do now to figure out some RB pairs?

CRITERIA #3 - USE FOOTBALLGUYS' RB STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE

This sounds pretty simple, doesn't it? Just take the RB Strength of Schedule to figure out when certain players are more likely to score well. What I did is similar to what the Projections Dominator and Draft Dominator do for you - take the projected fantasy points and slice them up over 16 weeks based on the strength of schedule. I call this result the "distributed fantasy points" for each back.

After I had all 26 running backs with distributed fantasy points on a weekly basis, I just compared all of the possible RB pairs to find the best duos for RB2BC. So here we are - time for some results.

Table 2: PPR Running Back #2 Committee Pairs

As we can see from Table 2, we have some very good pairs to select from for RB2BC. There is one running back outside of the Top 24 that is projected to outpace several Top 24 RBs in fantasy scoring in 2015 - Giovani Bernard - so expect to see his name appear quite often as I build these pairs.  I could almost stop right there, but I need to be thorough as the ADPs tend to get very fluid as preseason wears on, and we need to make certain we have the very best pairings in case our draft plans go awry.  So digging in, there are 59 pairs that are worth more than or equal to Giovani Bernard by his lonesome, so it looks like there will be a number of options.  Let's also take a look at how often some of these guys show up on the table:

Table 3: PPR Running Back #2 Committee Pair Appearances by Player

As we can see from Table 3, two RBs in addition to Bernard show up on this list with a lot of regularity – Ryan Mathews, Ameer Abdullah and Melvin Gordon.  In fact, as I mentioned earlier, Bernard is projected to be worth more on his own than Danny Woodhead (ADP of RB22) himself.  That tells that this tier of RB20-30 is pretty up in the air as far as who will do the best.  All the more reason to get a favorable pair when it comes to strength of schedule.

PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER

Now that we have 59 possible pairs that are better than Giovani Bernard, what exactly does that mean? Should Bernard be the basis of our comparison? Of course not. Remember our goal - find a pair of running backs that can combine for RB2 (or better) fantasy production. To figure that out we need a better metric, so here are the projections for RB1 through RB24 (and beyond), using PPR:

Table 4: Projected PPR Fantasy Points for RBs 1-30

Based on Table 4, we see some things that catch the eye.  First, the projections and the ADP do not line up well at all. There is a total jumble from RB12-30 (which is why I extended the list beyond RB24), with running backs projected to be drafted in Rounds 5 and 6 projected to be anywhere from RB15 (Duke Johnson, ADP 52 overall) to RB29 (Jonathan Stewart, ADP 70).  Several fifth and sixth round ADP running backs are projected to outscore two backs (DeMarco Murray, Matt Jones) just beyond the Top 24 RBs on the ADP list.   Next, it jumps out that only 17 running backs are projected to score over 190 points.  Now, to be fair, these running backs in Table 4 have a giant “zero” on their bye week, while our RB2BC duos never have a week off.  To compensate for that, we should add in 5-10 points for a bye week lineup fill-in that someone who owned of these players would use.  Even with an extra 5-10 points, however, only 20 running backs would be over 188 projected points.  Looking at our possible pairs, we have 17 pairs that meet or beat 188 fantasy points, which would put those duos comparable to projected RB21, Danny Woodhead (178 + 10 points with a bye week replacement).  This tells us that choosing the correct pair can give us the result we wanted - RB2 production on the cheap. 

Now, to look for the best bargains available, let's take one more final look at these pairs, focusing on those that project to be comparable to at least 185 total points:

Table 5: Top 28 PPR RB2BC Options for 2016

In prior years,  I would have said that we should focus on the best of the bargain bin - pairs of running backs that include no more than one RB with ADP of RB27, and possibly both backs with ADP of 30 or higher. This year, with the value you can steal with getting Giovani Bernard in Round 5, I say to throw that plan out (or make it "Plan B") and just go get Giovani Bernard in Round 5.  His ADP of 63 should make this a very simple plan to follow.  No matter who you pair him with in Round 6 or 7 - Ryan Mathews, Melvin Gordon, Jonathan Stewart or Frank Gore, for example - you should have 190+ points and have a RB2BC that projects to be at or near a higher end RB2.  Taking Bernard in Round 5 and then snapping up Mathews in Round 6 is one of the best ways to play it, as both backs should be big parts of the offense for their respective teams.  Bernard is going to be utilized quite a bit this year with both Mohamed Sanu and Marvin Jones gone via free agency, while Mathews looks to be at least splitting time in Philadelphia with Darren Sproles.  

Judging from current ADP, there is one nightmare scenario where you could have an early Round 5 pick (taking Bernard) and most of these guys are gone by Pick 70-72.  In that case, the fallback position I would take would be to snap up Jonathan Stewart (current ADP of 70), with the disaster plan going towards Melvin Gordon (ADP 75) if no one else you like on the list is available.  My favorite pair this year is Gio Bernard and Ryan Mathews, followed by Bernard and Stewart.  Stewart will be the top back again in Carolina and be very productive in that role once again this year.  Just be sure to secure Bernard in Round 5 and everything will work out great for your RB2BC.

Here is a final summary of the combined schedules for both Giovani Bernard with Ryan Mathews or Jonathan Stewart, and when the committee approach suggests starting each one:

Table 6: Suggested PPR RB2BC Schedule Plan - Giovani Bernard and Ryan Mathews (preferred)

Table 7:  Suggested PPR RB2BC Schedule Plan - Giovani Bernard and Jonathan Stewart

Take note in Table 7 above that Week 12 for both Stewart (at Oakland) and Bernard (vs. San Francisco) project similarly, so a "gut call" on who to start would be needed.

The committee approach is not a perfect one, but having this knowledge prior to your fantasy draft can prove to be invaluable if you decide to adopt this approach.  If all the players on your starter list are gone, goiong with a committee can save your team and help you deal with the loss of bigger names.  The method is also a big help in "Best Ball" leagues, where lineup decisions are not necessary every week.  That's exactly where a committee can do the best, as either player can count for you each week.

Questions, suggestions and comments are always welcome to pasquino@footballguys.com.

Follow @JeffPasquino