The following is an update to an excellent freelance submission to Footballguys several years ago by Todd Conrad.
Talk about a misleading title. A perfect auto-pick style draft doesn't exist. Having your team drafted this way means giving up control. It means removing emotion, gut instincts. A cold, heartless computer algorithm decides who will be in your starting lineup on opening day.
The best draft will always be a late August afternoon with nine or eleven of your closest buds and adult beverages of choice (however I recommend going light on the latter until after the draft). Trash talking and heckling are mandatory, as well as careful opponent reconnaissance and possible sabotage ("you know, I heard that Harbaugh promised the starting gig to Kaepernick…"). Alas, no such frivolity exists with an auto-pick draft.
Does that mean you should only participate in live drafts? Of course not. While I firmly believe that every person who takes fantasy football seriously should set aside some time to draft a team first hand, it would be foolish to insist on it every time. Although it's not ideal, the auto-pick draft is a fair, convenient way to fill out rosters. Each owner is drafted by the same rules, and the inevitable problem of scheduling a common draft time is eliminated.
In fact, such a draft has some advantages in the long run. Since you cannot completely control your selections, you are bound to end up with players you have not rostered before. No matter how much you study the sport, nothing beats first-hand experience. Is a player consistent or does he tend to have a few big games that skew his statistics? How often is he injured? Perhaps more importantly, does his coaching staff announce starting decisions early enough for you to find a suitable replacement? Human nature causes us to gravitate toward players we are familiar with, so being exposed to more players will help you draft and play better in all your leagues.
Now that I've waffled more than a politician, let's determine the best strategy for filling out an auto-pick roster.
Two Types of Auto-Pick Drafts
There are two common types of auto-pick drafts:
Single-List Draft - You create a single list of players, mixing different positions based on overall value. This is the most common style of auto-pick draft.
Multi-List Draft - You supply the drafting program with a different player ranking list for each position. In addition, you also tell the program what to draft in each round (running back in the 1st, wide receiver in the 2nd, quarterback in the 3rd, etc.). Therefore, your drafted roster will have the positional makeup you desire.
I am not a big fan of multi-list drafts. To start off with, you need to know your draft position before telling the program what position to fill in each round. With that information, you must guess what players will be taken ahead of you. For example, if you're picking toward the end of the first round, you may elect to draft a wide receiver, thinking all the top-tier running backs will be gone.
The second problem I have with this style of draft is the lack of flexibility. What if you decide to go with a receiver with the 10th pick and the run on RBs didn't materialize? You're stuck drafting a WR in the first round, even though a stud like Darren McFadden may still be on the board.
Fortunately, most programs utilize a single-list format, so that's what I'll focus on here.
For example purposes, I'll assume a 10-team league starting 1 QB, 2 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE, 1 K, 1 Def, and 6 reserves for a total roster size of 15. This is the public league configuration of a very popular online provider. I'll develop an example as we go along, finishing up with an actual list and draft for analysis.
Preparation for a Single-List Draft
The Money Players
The core of your roster will be filled in the first 4-5 rounds. Here is where you pick the players that will have the biggest impact on your team. Fortunately, you have the most influence in the early rounds of the draft.
If you're reading this on Footballguys.com, you already know about value-based drafting, or VBD. I'll refrain from piling on more praise, other than to say I feel it's by far the best tool for any draft, but especially single-list auto-pick drafts. Nothing beats a VBD cheat sheet, customized for your league's scoring system, rules, and roster requirements. On the other hand, the absolute worst thing you can do is not use a customized cheat sheet. The league provider site's default ranking may be extremely illogical, not to mention you will likely be drafting from the same ranking list as others in your league.
Let's get started. Using your VBD cheat sheet, fill out the first 40-50 list entries. You are not concerned with which positions are drafted. You are only interested in maximizing value. Most automatic drafting algorithms wait until each team has filled out its starting roster before drafting bench players (more on that later), so don't be worried about drafting three kickers in the first five rounds. The computer won't allow it.
As an example, let's assume your draft starts like this:
Round 1: Adrian Peterson Round 2: Larry Fitzgerald Round 3: Ahmad Bradshaw Round 4: DeSean Jackson Round 5: Jason Witten
Notice that you still don't have a QB. No problem. You still have the opportunity to fill out the rest of your roster with quality players.
Understanding the Machine (Part I)
Let's pause for a moment and discuss some of the logic used in most automatic drafting algorithms.
I'm sure every algorithm is a little different, but each has the same purpose: to evenly distribute players and set up a competitive league. Said another way, the programmer forces the algorithm to make "intelligent" drafting choices.
The first fundamental rule employed by most algorithms is that all teams will draft complete starting lineups before any reserves are drafted. This is a very useful piece of information.
Since our 10-team league starts nine players each week, the following will be off the board by the end of Round 9:
10 quarterbacks 20 running backs 30 wide receivers 10 tight ends 10 kickers 10 defenses
This means no matter how you build your draft list, you are guaranteed one of your top 10 quarterbacks, tight ends, kickers, and defenses. Similarly, both of your starting running backs will be in your top 20 and all three of your starting wide receivers will be in your VBD's top 30.
Filling Out Your Starting Lineup
Okay, so you have five core players. At this point you are probably wondering why you can't continue the VBD method for the entire draft. Sounds logical, but any real Footballguy knows that after about 50 players FBG recommends that you "draft by position lists based on need." But how do you know what you need? After five rounds your roster could consist of almost any combination of position players. But all is not lost. We can still direct the algorithm to make logical choices.
First, you must rank each POSITION based on its value to your roster. Here's where it's extremely important to know the rules of your league. Does your league start three wide receivers? If so, a strong group of receivers will be desired. Does your league utilize a flex (RB/WR) position? This places more value on running backs. By asking these questions you go a long way toward filling out the rest of your list. If you have trouble, start by looking at your VBD list so far. What positions are most common on the list?
While valuing each position, you should also take advantage of how the algorithm works. If you feel the draft is deep at a position, lower it in your valuation. For example, many people believe this year contains a large number of mid-level tight ends. Therefore, I move TEs down my valuation order, even though the position typically scores the most points. Remember, my worst-case scenario still lands me someone in my top ten.
Hold the nachos a second. Doesn't that preclude you from getting a top-tier name like Antonio Gates or Jason Witten? No, because your well-crafted VBD list already contains those guys in your top 40-50 players. Gates will be yours if he is available and has the most value of all players left on the board.
For the sake of our example, let's assume our position ranking goes like this:
- Running Backs
- Wide Receivers
- Quarterbacks
- Tight Ends
- Defenses
- Kickers
Starting with the most important position (in this case running backs) add players until your list contains the number of required starters PLUS two reserves for each team in the league. In our example, 20 starting running backs will be used each week. Finding the last running back in your VBD rankings, add backs until you have a total of 40 on your list.
Repeat the process for your second-most valuable position, in this case, wide receivers. In our league, 30 WRs will start each week, so we'll put 50 total receivers on our list.
Continue down your positions, only including the number of starters plus one reserve. That would be 20 QBs, 20 TEs. When it comes down to kickers and defense, I recommend only listing the number starting in the league, or 10 Ks, and 10 Defs in this case. These positions are less critical, plus it doesn't hurt to encourage the algorithm to choose the players you want by giving it more choices at those positions.
Our example above has drafted two running backs, two wide receivers and a tight end. Our starting lineup is satisfied at RB and TE, but we still need one WR, a QB, a kicker, and a defense. By grouping players at each position and then ordering the positions based on value, we are instructing the algorithm to fill out our starting lineup based on the importance of each position. In our case, the program will skip over all our running backs and draft the next most important position, a wide receiver. (Note that players will continue to be selected from our VBD list as long as they fill a starting lineup requirement.) Based on our rankings, a receiver should be chosen next, followed by a quarterback, kicker and defense to round out or starting lineup.
Now it is time to talk about our bench.
Understanding the Machine (Part II)
The second fundamental rule of the drafting algorithm is to prevent any team from stocking up at one position. To do this, the program will give each team a bench containing a pre-determined positional makeup.
A typical auto-picked bench will consist of one player at each position, or possibly two at one skill position and only one reserve kicker or defense.
The bad news is you end up with a more generic roster than you would have if you had participated in a live draft. The good news is it limits the number of players drafted at the critical positions, thus leaving you a healthy pool of free agents available on your waiver wire.
Personally, I prefer my bench to look something like:
1 quarterback 2 running backs 2 wide receivers 1 utility player
This gives me solid backups at each of the three skill positions, plus a "utility player" to be used for waiver wire pickups during tight end, kicker, and defense bye weeks. (Obviously, these three positions must have different bye weeks, so some planning is involved.)
Unfortunately, the program forces the typical bench to look more like:
1 quarterback 1 running backs 2 wide receivers 1 tight end 1 kicker or defense
This isn't too bad for QB and WR positions, but it leaves us terribly thin at RB, our most valued position. Usually that means heading straight to the waiver wire and replacing that kicker or defense.
Back to the Draft
For our example, reserves begin to be drafted in round 10.
It's pretty safe to assume that by the end of round 9, all 50 of your VBD-list players will be off the board. However, if one of your top 50 players falls through the cracks, consider yourself lucky to be getting that caliber a player in the 10th round. Most likely though, at this point the algorithm will be looking at your position lists.
Remember, we valued running back as our most important position. Since you only have one reserve, it becomes critical that the first reserve you draft is a running back. Doing so ensures you of acquiring the best reserve running back left on the board. Let other owners select backup quarterbacks, tight ends, or (gasp!) kickers in round 10. You'll gladly take the best available running back and move on as you build a much stronger team than your competition.
When all is said and done, we want to encourage our bench to be drafted based on our positional valuations.
Let's do an actual draft. Here are our final rankings, including the actual draft results:
Overall |
Pos |
PosRank |
Player |
Team |
Points |
VBD |
1 |
RB |
1 |
Arian Foster |
Hou/11 |
276.9 |
103 |
2 |
RB |
2 |
Ray Rice |
Bal/5 |
272.0 |
99 |
3 |
WR |
1 |
Andre Johnson |
Hou/11 |
276.8 |
93 |
4 |
RB |
3 |
LeSean McCoy |
Phi/7 |
257.1 |
84 |
5 |
WR |
2 |
Calvin Johnson |
Det/9 |
262.1 |
78 |
6 |
RB |
4 |
Adrian Peterson |
Min/9 |
250.8 |
77 |
7 |
WR |
3 |
Roddy White |
Atl/8 |
256.7 |
73 |
8 |
RB |
5 |
Jamaal Charles |
KC/6 |
244.9 |
71 |
9 |
WR |
4 |
Hakeem Nicks |
NYG/7 |
253.5 |
70 |
10 |
QB |
1 |
Aaron Rodgers |
GB/8 |
300.0 |
67 |
11 |
QB |
2 |
Michael Vick |
Phi/7 |
297.8 |
65 |
12 |
RB |
6 |
Darren McFadden |
Oak/8 |
238.0 |
65 |
13 |
RB |
7 |
Matt Forte |
Chi/8 |
236.3 |
63 |
14 |
RB |
8 |
Steven Jackson |
StL/5 |
233.9 |
60 |
15 |
RB |
9 |
Rashard Mendenhall |
Pit/11 |
232.3 |
59 |
16 |
WR |
5 |
Larry Fitzgerald |
Ari/6 |
242.2 |
58 |
17 |
RB |
10 |
Peyton Hillis |
Cle/5 |
227.0 |
54 |
18 |
RB |
11 |
Maurice Jones-Drew |
Jac/9 |
226.0 |
53 |
19 |
WR |
6 |
Vincent Jackson |
SD/6 |
235.2 |
51 |
20 |
WR |
7 |
Greg Jennings |
GB/8 |
232.1 |
48 |
21 |
WR |
8 |
Mike Wallace |
Pit/11 |
231.3 |
47 |
22 |
RB |
12 |
Frank Gore |
SF/7 |
218.2 |
45 |
23 |
QB |
3 |
Tom Brady |
NE/7 |
277.7 |
45 |
24 |
RB |
13 |
Ahmad Bradshaw |
NYG/7 |
211.0 |
38 |
25 |
WR |
9 |
Dwayne Bowe |
KC/6 |
220.8 |
37 |
26 |
RB |
14 |
Jahvid Best |
Det/9 |
209.7 |
36 |
27 |
QB |
4 |
Tony Romo |
Dal/5 |
267.6 |
35 |
28 |
WR |
10 |
Miles Austin |
Dal/5 |
218.2 |
34 |
29 |
QB |
5 |
Philip Rivers |
SD/6 |
266.9 |
34 |
30 |
RB |
15 |
Felix Jones |
Dal/5 |
206.7 |
33 |
31 |
RB |
16 |
Chris Johnson |
Ten/6 |
205.5 |
32 |
32 |
QB |
6 |
Drew Brees |
NO/11 |
263.0 |
30 |
33 |
WR |
11 |
Brandon Marshall |
Mia/5 |
213.2 |
29 |
34 |
WR |
12 |
Santonio Holmes |
NYJ/8 |
211.2 |
27 |
35 |
WR |
13 |
Brandon Lloyd |
Den/6 |
209.6 |
26 |
36 |
WR |
14 |
DeSean Jackson |
Phi/7 |
209.5 |
26 |
37 |
WR |
15 |
Wes Welker |
NE/7 |
208.3 |
24 |
38 |
WR |
16 |
Mike Williams |
TB/8 |
207.1 |
23 |
39 |
WR |
17 |
Dez Bryant |
Dal/5 |
206.6 |
23 |
40 |
RB |
17 |
DeAngelo Williams |
Car/9 |
193.8 |
20 |
41 |
WR |
18 |
Reggie Wayne |
Ind/11 |
203.6 |
20 |
42 |
WR |
19 |
Percy Harvin |
Min/9 |
200.2 |
16 |
43 |
TE |
1 |
Antonio Gates |
SD/6 |
190.3 |
16 |
44 |
WR |
20 |
Steve Johnson |
Buf/7 |
199.4 |
16 |
45 |
TE |
2 |
Jason Witten |
Dal/5 |
189.8 |
15 |
46 |
RB |
18 |
LeGarrette Blount |
TB/8 |
187.4 |
14 |
47 |
RB |
19 |
Michael Turner |
Atl/8 |
187.1 |
14 |
48 |
WR |
21 |
Mario Manningham |
NYG/7 |
197.1 |
13 |
49 |
RB |
20 |
Knowshon Moreno |
Den/6 |
186.0 |
13 |
50 |
QB |
7 |
Ben Roethlisberger |
Pit/11 |
243.0 |
10 |
51 |
RB |
21 |
Mark Ingram |
NO/11 |
183.4 |
10 |
53 |
RB |
22 |
Fred Jackson |
Buf/7 |
179.8 |
6 |
55 |
RB |
23 |
Ryan Mathews |
SD/6 |
178.4 |
5 |
65 |
RB |
24 |
Cedric Benson |
Cin/7 |
173.3 |
0 |
73 |
RB |
25 |
Shonn Greene |
NYJ/8 |
169.9 |
-4 |
74 |
RB |
26 |
Tim Hightower |
Was/5 |
169.7 |
-4 |
78 |
RB |
27 |
Marshawn Lynch |
Sea/6 |
167.0 |
-6 |
79 |
RB |
28 |
Reggie Bush |
Mia/5 |
166.8 |
-7 |
98 |
RB |
29 |
Joseph Addai |
Ind/11 |
157.3 |
-16 |
103 |
RB |
30 |
Ryan Grant |
GB/8 |
155.8 |
-18 |
110 |
RB |
31 |
Chris Wells |
Ari/6 |
154.4 |
-19 |
139 |
RB |
32 |
Brandon Jacobs |
NYG/7 |
146.0 |
-27 |
151 |
RB |
33 |
Mike Tolbert |
SD/6 |
136.7 |
-37 |
176 |
RB |
34 |
C.J. Spiller |
Buf/7 |
124.0 |
-49 |
187 |
RB |
35 |
Darren Sproles |
NO/11 |
117.1 |
-56 |
191 |
RB |
36 |
Daniel Thomas |
Mia/5 |
114.7 |
-59 |
193 |
RB |
37 |
LaDainian Tomlinson |
NYJ/8 |
114.0 |
-59 |
194 |
RB |
38 |
Rashad Jennings |
Jac/9 |
113.8 |
-60 |
198 |
RB |
39 |
Danny Woodhead |
NE/7 |
112.1 |
-61 |
206 |
RB |
40 |
Jonathan Stewart |
Car/9 |
107.1 |
-66 |
52 |
WR |
22 |
Anquan Boldin |
Bal/5 |
192.6 |
9 |
54 |
WR |
23 |
Santana Moss |
Was/5 |
189.2 |
5 |
57 |
WR |
24 |
Kenny Britt |
Ten/6 |
187.7 |
4 |
66 |
WR |
25 |
Mike Thomas |
Jac/9 |
183.5 |
0 |
68 |
WR |
26 |
Austin Collie |
Ind/11 |
182.4 |
-1 |
72 |
WR |
27 |
Marques Colston |
NO/11 |
180.7 |
-3 |
85 |
WR |
28 |
Julio Jones |
Atl/8 |
173.7 |
-10 |
113 |
WR |
29 |
A.J. Green |
Cin/7 |
164.0 |
-20 |
115 |
WR |
30 |
Sidney Rice |
Sea/6 |
163.6 |
-20 |
131 |
WR |
31 |
Steve Smith |
Car/9 |
158.3 |
-26 |
133 |
WR |
32 |
Chad Ochocinco |
NE/7 |
157.9 |
-26 |
134 |
WR |
33 |
Lance Moore |
NO/11 |
157.9 |
-26 |
136 |
WR |
34 |
Pierre Garcon |
Ind/11 |
157.5 |
-26 |
143 |
WR |
35 |
Johnny Knox |
Chi/8 |
155.8 |
-28 |
149 |
WR |
36 |
Jeremy Maclin |
Phi/7 |
148.6 |
-35 |
150 |
WR |
37 |
Jacoby Ford |
Oak/8 |
147.3 |
-37 |
153 |
WR |
38 |
Lee Evans |
Bal/5 |
146.0 |
-38 |
158 |
WR |
39 |
Davone Bess |
Mia/5 |
144.3 |
-40 |
162 |
WR |
40 |
Nate Burleson |
Det/9 |
141.6 |
-42 |
163 |
WR |
41 |
Denarius Moore |
Oak/8 |
141.3 |
-43 |
167 |
WR |
42 |
Andre Roberts |
Ari/6 |
140.7 |
-43 |
169 |
WR |
43 |
Mike Sims-Walker |
StL/5 |
140.1 |
-44 |
173 |
WR |
44 |
Mike Williams |
Sea/6 |
134.7 |
-49 |
174 |
WR |
45 |
Braylon Edwards |
SF/7 |
134.6 |
-49 |
175 |
WR |
46 |
Robert Meachem |
NO/11 |
134.5 |
-49 |
179 |
WR |
47 |
Hines Ward |
Pit/11 |
134.0 |
-50 |
182 |
WR |
48 |
Malcom Floyd |
SD/6 |
129.4 |
-54 |
183 |
WR |
49 |
Arrelious Benn |
TB/8 |
129.2 |
-55 |
185 |
WR |
50 |
Plaxico Burress |
NYJ/8 |
128.2 |
-56 |
56 |
QB |
8 |
Peyton Manning |
Ind/11 |
237.4 |
4 |
67 |
QB |
9 |
Matthew Stafford |
Det/9 |
232.7 |
0 |
69 |
QB |
10 |
Matt Schaub |
Hou/11 |
231.3 |
-2 |
77 |
QB |
11 |
Josh Freeman |
TB/8 |
227.3 |
-6 |
86 |
QB |
12 |
Matt Ryan |
Atl/8 |
222.6 |
-10 |
90 |
QB |
13 |
Joe Flacco |
Bal/5 |
219.6 |
-13 |
107 |
QB |
14 |
Kevin Kolb |
Ari/6 |
214.5 |
-19 |
108 |
QB |
15 |
Eli Manning |
NYG/7 |
214.4 |
-19 |
126 |
QB |
16 |
Jay Cutler |
Chi/8 |
209.2 |
-24 |
128 |
QB |
17 |
Mark Sanchez |
NYJ/8 |
208.4 |
-25 |
129 |
QB |
18 |
Sam Bradford |
StL/5 |
208.2 |
-25 |
145 |
QB |
19 |
Jason Campbell |
Oak/8 |
203.3 |
-30 |
146 |
QB |
20 |
Matt Cassel |
KC/6 |
203.0 |
-30 |
59 |
TE |
3 |
Jermichael Finley |
GB/8 |
177.2 |
3 |
61 |
TE |
4 |
Vernon Davis |
SF/7 |
174.5 |
0 |
63 |
TE |
5 |
Dallas Clark |
Ind/11 |
174.3 |
0 |
75 |
TE |
6 |
Owen Daniels |
Hou/11 |
170.3 |
-4 |
94 |
TE |
7 |
Rob Gronkowski |
NE/7 |
160.0 |
-14 |
123 |
TE |
8 |
Marcedes Lewis |
Jac/9 |
152.1 |
-22 |
127 |
TE |
9 |
Kellen Winslow |
TB/8 |
149.9 |
-24 |
130 |
TE |
10 |
Jimmy Graham |
NO/11 |
149.2 |
-25 |
135 |
TE |
11 |
Tony Gonzalez |
Atl/8 |
148.4 |
-26 |
137 |
TE |
12 |
Brandon Pettigrew |
Det/9 |
147.4 |
-27 |
152 |
TE |
13 |
Dustin Keller |
NYJ/8 |
136.7 |
-38 |
156 |
TE |
14 |
Jared Cook |
Ten/6 |
135.5 |
-39 |
168 |
TE |
15 |
Greg Olsen |
Car/9 |
131.0 |
-43 |
177 |
TE |
16 |
Jermaine Gresham |
Cin/7 |
124.8 |
-50 |
180 |
TE |
17 |
Heath Miller |
Pit/11 |
122.0 |
-52 |
184 |
TE |
18 |
Brent Celek |
Phi/7 |
119.5 |
-55 |
186 |
TE |
19 |
Zach Miller |
Sea/6 |
118.4 |
-56 |
189 |
TE |
20 |
Fred Davis |
Was/5 |
117.2 |
-57 |
60 |
DEF |
1 |
Green Bay |
GB/8 |
150.7 |
1 |
62 |
DEF |
2 |
Pittsburgh |
Pit/11 |
149.7 |
0 |
76 |
DEF |
3 |
New England |
NE/7 |
142.6 |
-6 |
82 |
DEF |
4 |
Philadelphia |
Phi/7 |
139.4 |
-8 |
93 |
DEF |
5 |
New York Jets |
NYJ/8 |
132.4 |
-14 |
99 |
DEF |
6 |
Baltimore |
Bal/5 |
129.1 |
-16 |
104 |
DEF |
7 |
Chicago |
Chi/8 |
127.0 |
-18 |
106 |
DEF |
8 |
New Orleans |
NO/11 |
126.6 |
-18 |
112 |
DEF |
9 |
Detroit |
Det/9 |
125.2 |
-20 |
116 |
DEF |
10 |
New York Giants |
NYG/7 |
124.2 |
-20 |
58 |
PK |
1 |
Nate Kaeding |
SD/6 |
132.1 |
3 |
64 |
PK |
2 |
Mason Crosby |
GB/8 |
127.6 |
0 |
70 |
PK |
3 |
Alex Henery |
Phi/7 |
124.5 |
-3 |
71 |
PK |
4 |
Stephen Gostkowski |
NE/7 |
124.5 |
-3 |
80 |
PK |
5 |
Dan Bailey |
Dal/5 |
118.1 |
-8 |
81 |
PK |
6 |
Shaun Suisham |
Pit/11 |
117.8 |
-8 |
83 |
PK |
7 |
Garrett Hartley |
NO/11 |
116.8 |
-9 |
84 |
PK |
8 |
Sebastian Janikowski |
Oak/8 |
116.5 |
-9 |
87 |
PK |
9 |
Neil Rackers |
Hou/11 |
114.3 |
-11 |
88 |
PK |
10 |
Adam Vinatieri |
Ind/11 |
112.6 |
-12 |
Table 1: Our Pre-Draft Rankings
Player Drafted in Bold Green
Top 50 - Determined by VBD Ranking
Players 51-150 - Determined by Positional Rankings
Here is also the positional breakdown of the Top 90 as well as the recipe for the Total List:
Pos |
Top 50 |
Total List |
RB |
20 |
40 |
WR |
21 |
50 |
QB |
7 |
20 |
TE |
2 |
20 |
PK |
0 |
10 |
Def |
0 |
10 |
Total |
50 |
150 |
Table 2: Positional Breakdowns for Top 90 (Starters) and Top 150 (Full Squad)
So How Did We Do?
Drafting 8th in a serpentine draft, our starting lineup looks like:
Round 1: Arian Foster – Hou/11 (ranked RB1 on our board) Round 2: Hakeem Nicks – NYG/7 (WR4) Round 3: Matt Forte – Chi/8 (RB7) Round 4: Dwayne Bowe – KC/6 (WR9) Round 5: Brandon Marshall – Mia/5 (WR11) Round 6: Matthew Stafford – Det/9 (QB9) Round 7: Owen Daniels – Hou/11 (TE6) Round 8: Detroit Defense – Det/9 (Def9) Round 9: Alex Henery – Phi/7 (K3)
Not bad! Each of our starters is ranked in our top 10 at their respective positions aside from our WR3 (who still came in as a strong WR11), with an overall average positional ranking of 6.6 – even with those three wide receivers. We're a little weak at quarterback and defense, but we were okay with that plan at the onset when we had only seven QBs in our Top 50, virtually guaranteeing that we would be getting a second tier quarterback – but still in our Top 10. Getting Marshall as our WR3 was a steal, however, and should help our team in a big way. Now for our bench:
Round 10: Fred Jackson – Buf/7 (RB22) Round 11: Mike Thomas – Jac/9 (WR25) Round 12: Johnny Knox – Chi/8 (WR35) Round 13: Sam Bradford – StL/5 (QB18) Round 14: Jermaine Gresham – Cin/7 (TE16) Round 15: Dan Bailey – Dal/5 (K5)
The first thing to notice is our backups were drafted in the order we chose, based on our positional valuations. We lucked got lucky with both Fred Jackson, as Jackson was 53rd overall in our rankings, yet we still picked him up in round 10. If he secures the starting gig in Buffalo, we're golden.
Our final roster looks like:
Round |
Pick |
Player |
Pos Rank |
Bye |
1 |
1 |
Arian Foster (Hou - RB) |
RB1 |
11 |
2 |
20 |
Hakeem Nicks (NYG - |
WR4 |
7 |
3 |
21 |
Matt Forte (Chi - RB) |
RB7 |
8 |
4 |
40 |
Dwayne Bowe (KC - WR |
WR9 |
6 |
5 |
41 |
Brandon Marshall (Mia |
WR11 |
5 |
6 |
60 |
Matthew Stafford (Det |
QB9 |
9 |
7 |
61 |
Owen Daniels (Hou - TE |
TE6 |
11 |
8 |
80 |
Detroit (Det - DEF) |
DEF9 |
9 |
9 |
81 |
Alex Henery (Phi - K) |
K3 |
7 |
10 |
100 |
Fred Jackson (Buf - RB) |
RB22 |
7 |
11 |
101 |
Mike Thomas (Jac - WR) |
WR25 |
9 |
12 |
120 |
Johnny Knox (Chi - WR) |
WR35 |
8 |
13 |
121 |
Sam Bradford (StL - QB) |
QB18 |
5 |
14 |
140 |
Jermaine Gresham (Cin |
TE16 |
7 |
15 |
141 |
Dan Bailey (Dal - K) |
K5 |
5 |
Table 3: Final Roster
In general our bench looks pretty good too. We picked up solid backups at running back and wide receiver, while grabbing a serviceable second quarterback. As we anticipated, the program "forced" us to draft backups at tight end and kicker instead of giving us additional depth at a more valuable position. On the bright side, only 30 running backs were drafted, leaving some good talent on the waiver wire such as Tim Hightower and Joseph Addai.
After the Draft
Once the draft is complete, there's still work to be done. Like we just discussed, your bench won't have an ideal positional makeup. Now is the time to get your feet wet in the free agent pool.
Carefully study your roster and identify its weak points. Then go to the waiver wire and place claims on players you think will make your team stronger. Thanks to the algorithm's method of spreading players equally, there will undoubtedly be some good players out there waiting for you to pick them up. So drop that extra kicker and pick up Hightower or Addai (both went undrafted in this league).
Now is also the time to check for bye week conflicts. One of the worst things about the auto-pick format is there's no way to avoid drafting players with the same bye week. If it happens to you, see if you can pick up an extra player to help. You should also glance at your opponents' rosters to see if they have a similar bye week conflict. A trade of similar-talent players could ease both of your problems.
It looks like we got lucky in the bye week department. No position has a double-up of a bye week, so we look fantastic and ready to go.
Conclusion
So there you have it. I have used this method in at least a dozen drafts with considerable success. Was it a perfect draft? Maybe not, but it's certainly a lineup we can be proud to start the season with. Use this method and force the algorithm draft accordingly.
As always, questions, suggestions and comments are always welcome to pasquino@footballguys.com.

