Quarterback By Committee
Posted 8/17 by Chase Stuart - Exclusive to Footballguys.com
Note: If you play in a start-2 QB league, there's another article on the website specifically for, called 2QBBC (Start 2 QBs).
For the sixth year in a row, I'm advising fantasy players to use the Quarterback-By-Committee strategy in their fantasy leagues. The first six rounds of your draft should be used to assemble a wealth of talent at RB and WR (and occasionally, TE); it's usually not wise to waste an early draft pick on a quarterback. Your goal should be to save those high picks in your draft and still get solid fantasy production, by grabbing two or three QBs facing bad defenses every week of the year. That's what the QBBC system is all about.
In the past, I simply graded the defenses and then combined the schedules to see which QBs formed the best committees. As you can see at the bottom of this article, doing that will leave you with guys like Matt Hasselbeck, Shaun Hill, and Marc Bulger. Those guys aren't great QBs, but their schedules combine in a very impressive way. However, I understand that many of you will think that those QBs simply aren't good enough to win your league. To be more specific, those guys might produce the most value relative to their average draft position, but to win your league, you need lots of points. When QB10 performs like QB4, that's more valuable for fantasy leagues than when QB25 performs like QB10. As a result, I'm going to suggest you go with a two-man committee this year of mid-tier guys with great schedules, as opposed to lower-tier guys with excellent schedules.
The first key, of course, is to rank the defenses. I always start by adjusting last season's data on defenses for strength of schedule. I focus on two statistics - fantasy points allowed to opposing QBs and adjusted yards per attempt allowed to opposing QBs. This is a complicated process, which involves iterating strength of schedule adjustments many times for both QBs and defenses until reaching true ratings for each QB and defense. I recommend using a computer.
Fantasy points allowed (FPA) to opposing QBs is an obvious statistic to use; adjusted yards per attempt (AY/A) needs some explanation. The statistic is derived by taking total passing yards, and adding 20 yards per touchdown and subtracting 45 yards per interception; then those adjusted yards are divided by total attempts. This gives an NFL ranking of the pass defenses, which is important to have. Some teams gave up lots of rushing yards to opposing QBs, while others faced a ton of pass attempts last year. This would overstate their attractiveness to opposing QBs, because rushing FPs allowed to opposing QBs and pass attempts allowed aren't consistent from year to year. Space constraints prevent me from explaining each team's adjustment, but I've (with the help of Footballguys.com defensive experts Jene Bramel and Aaron Rudnicki) factored in each team's offseason to adjust their 2008 defensive numbers. The accompanying table shows each team's defense's 2009 projected rating and rank, along with the 2008 rankings of the defenses in fantasy points allowed and adjusted yards per attempt allowed.
|
'09 Proj
|
'09 Rank
|
Team
|
'08 FPA
|
'08 AYAA
|
|
6.5
|
1
|
Pittsburgh Steelers
|
7.1
|
2.5
|
|
4.3
|
2
|
Indianapolis Colts
|
6.8
|
1.0
|
|
3.8
|
3
|
Baltimore Ravens
|
3.3
|
2.1
|
|
3.6
|
4
|
Washington Redskins
|
2.6
|
0.7
|
|
2.7
|
5
|
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
|
2.5
|
1.3
|
|
2.1
|
6
|
Tennessee Titans
|
3.1
|
1.1
|
|
1.8
|
7
|
Philadelphia Eagles
|
2.1
|
0.9
|
|
1.7
|
8
|
Carolina Panthers
|
1.7
|
0.6
|
|
1.6
|
9
|
Minnesota Vikings
|
2.7
|
0.2
|
|
1.6
|
10
|
Oakland Raiders
|
2.2
|
0.4
|
|
1.5
|
11
|
Chicago Bears
|
0.5
|
0.8
|
|
1.5
|
12
|
New York Giants
|
1.0
|
0.3
|
|
1.4
|
13
|
Cleveland Browns
|
1.8
|
0.3
|
|
1.4
|
14
|
Green Bay Packers
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
|
-0.2
|
15
|
Cincinnati Bengals
|
-0.3
|
0.0
|
|
-0.2
|
16
|
Miami Dolphins
|
-0.5
|
0.1
|
|
-0.3
|
17
|
Buffalo Bills
|
0.3
|
-0.7
|
|
-0.3
|
18
|
New Orleans Saints
|
-1.7
|
0.2
|
|
-0.5
|
19
|
Atlanta Falcons
|
-0.7
|
-0.1
|
|
-0.6
|
20
|
Dallas Cowboys
|
0.0
|
-0.4
|
|
-0.7
|
21
|
San Diego Chargers
|
-2.9
|
0.1
|
|
-1.1
|
22
|
New York Jets
|
-3.0
|
-0.4
|
|
-1.2
|
23
|
Kansas City Chiefs
|
-1.2
|
-0.1
|
|
-1.2
|
24
|
San Francisco 49ers
|
-1.2
|
-0.4
|
|
-2.0
|
25
|
New England Patriots
|
-3.2
|
-0.9
|
|
-2.4
|
26
|
St. Louis Rams
|
-0.7
|
-1.7
|
|
-3.1
|
27
|
Houston Texans
|
-3.1
|
-1.2
|
|
-3.4
|
28
|
Denver Broncos
|
-1.5
|
-1.4
|
|
-3.5
|
29
|
Jacksonville Jaguars
|
-2.2
|
-1.6
|
|
-3.5
|
30
|
Seattle Seahawks
|
-4.3
|
-1.4
|
|
-5.4
|
31
|
Detroit Lions
|
-3.6
|
-2.9
|
|
-5.9
|
32
|
Arizona Cardinals
|
-8.4
|
-1.5
|
What do those numbers mean? The '6.5' in front of the Steelers means I expect fantasy QBs to score 6.5 fewer FP/G when playing Pittsburgh than when playing a league average defense. On the other hand, starting your QB against the Lions and Cardinals should once again be fantasy gold this season, as both teams should see lots of high scoring games in 2009. Finally, when the QB is on the road, 0.6 FP/G are added to his opponent's total score. So for Carson Palmer, when playing @Cleveland that goes down as a 2.4 FP/G tougher than average game, but when he plays the Browns at home his opponent is considered only 1.8 FP/G harder than average.
The QBBC Duo
In some years, I've advocated grabbing three low end QBs. This year, I think taking two mid-level QBs will work better. I eliminated all pairs that had a QB with an ADP in the Top 10 or a QB without much fantasy potential. The duo that best represents high upside, a relatively low ADP, and a terrific combined schedule is David Garrard and Matt Schaub. Both QBs are undervalued, in my opinion. In my Rearview QB analysis article form earlier this summer, I noted that Schaub ranked fifth in adjusted fantasy points per adjusted game last season, while Garrard ranked 13th. According to MyFantasyLeague.com, Schaub has an ADP of QB11 (79th overall) and Garrard is being drafted as the 16th QB off the board (and 109th player overall.) Both QBs are underrated, but they're really undervalued as a duo.
The Combined Schedule
- Week 1: Houston vs. New York Jets (-1.1)
- Week 2: Jacksonville vs. Arizona (-5.9)
- Week 3: Houston vs. Jacksonville (-3.5)
- Week 4: Houston vs. Oakland (+1.6)
- Week 5: Houston @ Arizona (-5.3)
- Week 6: Jacksonville vs. St. Louis (-2.4)
- Week 7: Houston vs. San Francisco (-1.2)
- Week 8: Houston @ Buffalo (+0.3)
- Week 9: Jacksonville vs. Kansas City (-1.2)
- Week 10: Jacksonville @ New York Jets (-0.5)
- Week 11: Jacksonville vs. Buffalo (-0.3)
- Week 12: Jacksonville @ San Francisco (-0.6)
- Week 13: Jacksonville vs. Houston (-3.1)
- Week 14: Houston vs. Seattle (-3.5)
- Week 15: Houston @ St. Louis (-1.8)
- Week 16: Jacksonville @ New England (-1.4)
Eight of the games you'll start Schaub; eight weeks you'll play Garrard. Ten of the sixteen games are at home, while only two games are against harder than average defenses. Seven games come against Jacksonville or Houston (both have bad pass defenses, so you can play either QB that week), St. Louis, Arizona or Seattle. Another four come against San Francisco, Oakland or Kansas City, defenses that are always capable of imploding in any given week. The other five come against the AFC East, where all of those teams very inconsistent pass defenses. That week 16 game has some bad potential - remember what happened to Kurt Warner when he went to Foxboro in week 16 last year? The other option is Schaub on the road against Miami, which should be a much better weather game.
David Garrard - Draft (in 12 team league): Round 9
Garrard was in dire straights last year - he had a harder than average schedule and a weaker than average supporting cast. That's never a good combination. While his schedule was 1.6 FP/G tougher than average in '08, you'll be playing him against weak opponents in '09. More importantly, he's added WR Torry Holt, LT Tra Thomas, OT Eugene Monroe, OT Eben Britton, WR Mike Thomas and WR Jarrett Dillard since last year. And who knows, maybe even WR Mike Walker will be healthy and reach his potential this year. Guards Vincent Manuwai and Maurice Williams will be back after playing in just the opening game in '08, and center Brad Meester is finally healthy after dealing with a torn biceps for all of last season. Garrard's fantasy stock has soared in the last nine months.
Garrard ranked 4th in AdjFP/AdjG in '07; after a ton of injuries decimated the Jacksonville offense, he regressed to 13th in '08. But with a new line, a bunch of new targets, and the always capable MJD in the backfield, there's a lot to like about Garrard this season. With Fred Taylor no longer around, the offense will rely more on Garrard's arm and legs. He should be a perfect guy for any platoon.
Matt Schaub - Draft (in 12 team league): Round 7
Schaub was lights out last season, thanks to having the great Andre Johnson on his team. While he struggled with injuries both seasons in Houston so far, he's led all QBs (minimum 600 passes) in yards per attempt since becoming a Texan. That's right - no quarterback has averaged more yards per pass over the last two seasons than Matt Schaub, and the Texans should throw more passes than most teams again this year. Translation? Lots and lots of passing yards and fantasy points; while he missed time due to injuries last season, Schaub was on pace for nearly 4700 passing yards. So while Garrard has lots of reasons for optimism thanks to his team's great offseason, Schaub is already there. Yards per attempt is a metric that correlates better with future success than nearly any other stat, so seeing Schaub top the list is a good sign that he'll be great whenever he plays in 2009.
And what happens if he gets hurt? The Texans added Rex Grossman and Dan Orlovsky in the offseason, and both of them could be good in a pinch. Be sure to keep your eyes on the backup battle throughout the rest of preseason, right now Orlovsky appears to be the guy you want to roster, if you want Schaub's backup.
Other Pairs
Obviously, you might not be able to land both guys in your draft. The table below shows how many FP/G easier than average the combined schedules are. So Seattle and San Francisco have a schedule that should yield 46 fantasy points more than if they had a perfectly neutral schedule.
What happens if you want to grab Schaub and Garrard but miss out? You might want to wait for Trent Edwards and Matt Hasselbeck. Both players have some upside - Edwards has Evans and Owens and the no-huddle offense, while Hasselbeck has been there before and now has Houshmandzadeh. Those guys might be a good move at the 9/10 turn if you are picking towards the end of the round in odd rounds.
|
Quarterback Duo
|
FP Adv
|
Quarterback Duo
|
FP Adv
|
Quarterback Duo
|
FP Adv
|
|||
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
45.6
|
Cin QB
|
Jac QB
|
21.3
|
Cle QB
|
StL QB
|
10.5
|
|
SF QB
|
StL QB
|
45.4
|
Cle QB
|
Jac QB
|
21.2
|
Buf QB
|
Dal QB
|
10.5
|
|
Ind QB
|
Min QB
|
45.3
|
SD QB
|
StL QB
|
21.1
|
Buf QB
|
Min QB
|
10.5
|
|
Ind QB
|
Jac QB
|
45.2
|
Hou QB
|
NYJ QB
|
20.8
|
Buf QB
|
Cin QB
|
10.4
|
|
Ind QB
|
Sea QB
|
44.9
|
GB QB
|
Ten QB
|
20.8
|
Car QB
|
NE QB
|
10.3
|
|
Sea QB
|
StL QB
|
44.8
|
Det QB
|
Hou QB
|
20.7
|
Chi QB
|
Den QB
|
10.3
|
|
Ari QB
|
Ind QB
|
44.1
|
Ari QB
|
Pit QB
|
20.4
|
Chi QB
|
Phi QB
|
10.1
|
|
Ind QB
|
StL QB
|
44.0
|
Buf QB
|
GB QB
|
20.3
|
Cin QB
|
Dal QB
|
10.1
|
|
SF QB
|
Ten QB
|
43.8
|
Buf QB
|
Was QB
|
20.0
|
Cin QB
|
Hou QB
|
10.1
|
|
Ari QB
|
SF QB
|
41.5
|
Cin QB
|
Min QB
|
20.0
|
Mia QB
|
Phi QB
|
10.0
|
|
Jac QB
|
StL QB
|
41.0
|
Ari QB
|
Det QB
|
20.0
|
Cin QB
|
NO QB
|
10.0
|
|
Hou QB
|
Ten QB
|
40.2
|
Jac QB
|
SD QB
|
20.0
|
Chi QB
|
Pit QB
|
10.0
|
|
Jac QB
|
SF QB
|
38.7
|
Bal QB
|
Chi QB
|
19.9
|
Car QB
|
Cle QB
|
10.0
|
|
Chi QB
|
SF QB
|
38.6
|
GB QB
|
Jac QB
|
19.8
|
Det QB
|
NO QB
|
9.9
|
|
Ind QB
|
Ten QB
|
38.2
|
Jac QB
|
NYG QB
|
19.7
|
Bal QB
|
Ten QB
|
9.9
|
|
Hou QB
|
StL QB
|
38.1
|
Dal QB
|
Ten QB
|
19.7
|
NYG QB
|
Phi QB
|
9.8
|
|
Chi QB
|
StL QB
|
38.0
|
Ari QB
|
Was QB
|
19.6
|
Den QB
|
GB QB
|
9.7
|
|
Buf QB
|
SF QB
|
37.1
|
Chi QB
|
TB QB
|
19.5
|
NE QB
|
NYG QB
|
9.7
|
|
GB QB
|
Ind QB
|
37.0
|
NO QB
|
Was QB
|
19.4
|
Den QB
|
Ten QB
|
9.7
|
|
Min QB
|
SF QB
|
36.8
|
Atl QB
|
Jac QB
|
19.4
|
Bal QB
|
NO QB
|
9.7
|
|
Oak QB
|
Sea QB
|
36.7
|
GB QB
|
KC QB
|
19.4
|
Bal QB
|
NYJ QB
|
9.7
|
|
GB QB
|
SF QB
|
36.1
|
Dal QB
|
GB QB
|
19.3
|
Cle QB
|
Mia QB
|
9.7
|
|
Det QB
|
SF QB
|
36.0
|
KC QB
|
SF QB
|
19.2
|
NYJ QB
|
Phi QB
|
9.5
|
|
Oak QB
|
SF QB
|
35.8
|
Hou QB
|
Oak QB
|
19.2
|
Dal QB
|
Oak QB
|
9.3
|
|
Ari QB
|
Chi QB
|
35.8
|
Phi QB
|
Ten QB
|
19.1
|
NYG QB
|
TB QB
|
9.2
|
|
Hou QB
|
Ind QB
|
35.7
|
Car QB
|
Min QB
|
19.0
|
Car QB
|
Det QB
|
9.1
|
|
Hou QB
|
SF QB
|
35.7
|
Jac QB
|
Sea QB
|
18.7
|
Cin QB
|
NYJ QB
|
9.0
|
|
Ari QB
|
Ten QB
|
35.6
|
Bal QB
|
Min QB
|
18.6
|
Det QB
|
Pit QB
|
9.0
|
|
Hou QB
|
Sea QB
|
35.5
|
Chi QB
|
Oak QB
|
18.6
|
NYJ QB
|
Pit QB
|
8.9
|
|
Buf QB
|
Ind QB
|
34.9
|
Bal QB
|
Was QB
|
18.5
|
Dal QB
|
NYG QB
|
8.8
|
|
SF QB
|
Was QB
|
34.8
|
SD QB
|
Ten QB
|
18.4
|
Atl QB
|
Was QB
|
8.8
|
|
Ind QB
|
NYJ QB
|
34.8
|
Min QB
|
SD QB
|
18.4
|
NO QB
|
Oak QB
|
8.7
|
|
Ind QB
|
NE QB
|
34.6
|
Chi QB
|
Cle QB
|
18.2
|
NO QB
|
TB QB
|
8.6
|
|
StL QB
|
Was QB
|
34.2
|
Car QB
|
Ten QB
|
18.2
|
Den QB
|
NO QB
|
8.5
|
|
KC QB
|
StL QB
|
34.2
|
Ari QB
|
Cin QB
|
18.0
|
Car QB
|
Pit QB
|
8.5
|
|
Buf QB
|
Sea QB
|
34.1
|
Hou QB
|
SD QB
|
17.8
|
Buf QB
|
StL QB
|
8.4
|
|
Ind QB
|
NYG QB
|
33.9
|
Min QB
|
NE QB
|
17.8
|
NE QB
|
SD QB
|
8.4
|
|
NYJ QB
|
SF QB
|
33.6
|
Jac QB
|
Pit QB
|
17.7
|
NYG QB
|
SD QB
|
8.3
|
|
Cin QB
|
Ind QB
|
33.6
|
KC QB
|
Oak QB
|
17.7
|
Den QB
|
Sea QB
|
8.3
|
|
Ari QB
|
StL QB
|
33.6
|
Buf QB
|
NYG QB
|
17.7
|
NYG QB
|
Pit QB
|
8.3
|
|
Den QB
|
Ind QB
|
33.3
|
NE QB
|
NO QB
|
17.6
|
Buf QB
|
SD QB
|
8.1
|
|
SD QB
|
SF QB
|
33.3
|
Dal QB
|
Min QB
|
17.4
|
Dal QB
|
NYJ QB
|
8.1
|
|
Ind QB
|
Was QB
|
33.3
|
Min QB
|
Was QB
|
17.3
|
Den QB
|
Hou QB
|
8.0
|
|
Mia QB
|
StL QB
|
32.9
|
GB QB
|
NYJ QB
|
17.2
|
Det QB
|
NE QB
|
7.9
|
|
Car QB
|
SF QB
|
32.7
|
Ari QB
|
Cle QB
|
17.2
|
Car QB
|
NO QB
|
7.8
|
|
StL QB
|
Ten QB
|
32.6
|
Hou QB
|
NE QB
|
17.1
|
Den QB
|
Mia QB
|
7.6
|
|
Chi QB
|
Ind QB
|
32.4
|
Cle QB
|
Hou QB
|
16.9
|
Cin QB
|
NYG QB
|
7.5
|
|
Ind QB
|
Pit QB
|
32.3
|
Cin QB
|
Oak QB
|
16.9
|
Car QB
|
Den QB
|
7.5
|
|
Chi QB
|
Sea QB
|
32.1
|
Buf QB
|
Pit QB
|
16.8
|
Bal QB
|
KC QB
|
7.5
|
|
Cle QB
|
Sea QB
|
31.9
|
Dal QB
|
Was QB
|
16.7
|
GB QB
|
Phi QB
|
7.3
|
|
NYG QB
|
StL QB
|
31.7
|
Min QB
|
Pit QB
|
16.7
|
Cle QB
|
TB QB
|
7.3
|
|
Pit QB
|
SF QB
|
31.7
|
Ari QB
|
NE QB
|
16.7
|
Det QB
|
SD QB
|
7.3
|
|
Ari QB
|
Sea QB
|
31.4
|
Hou QB
|
TB QB
|
16.7
|
Atl QB
|
NYJ QB
|
7.1
|
|
Ind QB
|
SD QB
|
31.4
|
Bal QB
|
Hou QB
|
16.6
|
Bal QB
|
Car QB
|
7.0
|
|
GB QB
|
Sea QB
|
31.2
|
Jac QB
|
Min QB
|
16.5
|
Oak QB
|
TB QB
|
7.0
|
|
Cle QB
|
Ind QB
|
31.2
|
NYG QB
|
Oak QB
|
16.4
|
Car QB
|
KC QB
|
7.0
|
|
Mia QB
|
Ten QB
|
31.0
|
Hou QB
|
Mia QB
|
16.4
|
Det QB
|
TB QB
|
6.9
|
|
Jac QB
|
NO QB
|
30.9
|
Ind QB
|
Mia QB
|
16.2
|
Atl QB
|
Oak QB
|
6.9
|
|
NYG QB
|
Sea QB
|
30.7
|
Mia QB
|
NO QB
|
16.1
|
Dal QB
|
Det QB
|
6.8
|
|
Ari QB
|
Mia QB
|
30.5
|
NE QB
|
Oak QB
|
16.1
|
Pit QB
|
SD QB
|
6.8
|
|
Min QB
|
Ten QB
|
30.5
|
Hou QB
|
Pit QB
|
16.1
|
Chi QB
|
GB QB
|
6.7
|
|
Chi QB
|
Ten QB
|
30.2
|
GB QB
|
Pit QB
|
16.1
|
KC QB
|
SD QB
|
6.6
|
|
Hou QB
|
Jac QB
|
29.9
|
Buf QB
|
Mia QB
|
16.1
|
Dal QB
|
Phi QB
|
6.6
|
|
Jac QB
|
Oak QB
|
29.8
|
Ari QB
|
NYJ QB
|
16.1
|
Cle QB
|
Pit QB
|
6.5
|
|
Sea QB
|
Was QB
|
29.8
|
Car QB
|
Chi QB
|
16.1
|
Bal QB
|
Phi QB
|
6.2
|
|
GB QB
|
Hou QB
|
29.8
|
Det QB
|
Sea QB
|
16.0
|
Atl QB
|
Buf QB
|
6.1
|
|
Dal QB
|
Sea QB
|
29.4
|
Jac QB
|
Was QB
|
16.0
|
Dal QB
|
TB QB
|
6.0
|
|
NO QB
|
SF QB
|
29.4
|
GB QB
|
Oak QB
|
16.0
|
Atl QB
|
Mia QB
|
5.8
|
|
Pit QB
|
StL QB
|
29.3
|
NO QB
|
NYG QB
|
15.9
|
Cle QB
|
Det QB
|
5.7
|
|
Phi QB
|
SF QB
|
29.3
|
Jac QB
|
Ten QB
|
15.9
|
Det QB
|
KC QB
|
5.5
|
|
Mia QB
|
Sea QB
|
29.2
|
Jac QB
|
NE QB
|
15.8
|
Cle QB
|
Phi QB
|
5.5
|
|
Ari QB
|
Hou QB
|
29.2
|
Chi QB
|
Mia QB
|
15.8
|
Cle QB
|
SD QB
|
5.5
|
|
Cin QB
|
Ten QB
|
29.2
|
Bal QB
|
Oak QB
|
15.8
|
Cin QB
|
Phi QB
|
5.4
|
|
NO QB
|
Sea QB
|
29.1
|
Hou QB
|
Phi QB
|
15.7
|
Bal QB
|
Pit QB
|
5.3
|
|
Ind QB
|
SF QB
|
29.0
|
Oak QB
|
Was QB
|
15.7
|
Atl QB
|
NO QB
|
5.2
|
|
Sea QB
|
Ten QB
|
29.0
|
Buf QB
|
Hou QB
|
15.7
|
Cle QB
|
NE QB
|
5.0
|
|
Min QB
|
Sea QB
|
28.9
|
Den QB
|
StL QB
|
15.6
|
Atl QB
|
Hou QB
|
4.9
|
|
Ari QB
|
NYG QB
|
28.8
|
KC QB
|
NYJ QB
|
15.6
|
Dal QB
|
NO QB
|
4.8
|
|
NE QB
|
StL QB
|
27.9
|
Car QB
|
Cin QB
|
15.4
|
KC QB
|
Phi QB
|
4.6
|
|
Cin QB
|
Sea QB
|
27.9
|
Bal QB
|
NYG QB
|
15.3
|
Cin QB
|
SD QB
|
4.5
|
|
Buf QB
|
Jac QB
|
27.8
|
Det QB
|
GB QB
|
15.3
|
Den QB
|
Was QB
|
4.4
|
|
Sea QB
|
TB QB
|
27.8
|
Atl QB
|
Min QB
|
15.2
|
KC QB
|
NYG QB
|
4.3
|
|
Ari QB
|
Jac QB
|
27.7
|
Ari QB
|
TB QB
|
15.2
|
Cle QB
|
NYG QB
|
4.1
|
|
Bal QB
|
StL QB
|
27.7
|
Dal QB
|
Hou QB
|
15.2
|
Atl QB
|
Pit QB
|
4.1
|
|
NYG QB
|
SF QB
|
27.7
|
Chi QB
|
Cin QB
|
15.2
|
Chi QB
|
NO QB
|
4.0
|
|
Det QB
|
Ind QB
|
27.6
|
Mia QB
|
NYG QB
|
15.1
|
Cin QB
|
Det QB
|
4.0
|
|
Car QB
|
StL QB
|
27.6
|
NYG QB
|
NYJ QB
|
15.0
|
GB QB
|
NO QB
|
3.8
|
|
NE QB
|
SF QB
|
27.2
|
KC QB
|
Min QB
|
15.0
|
Atl QB
|
Cle QB
|
3.8
|
|
NYJ QB
|
Ten QB
|
27.1
|
Cle QB
|
GB QB
|
15.0
|
Atl QB
|
Bal QB
|
3.8
|
|
Ari QB
|
NO QB
|
27.0
|
Chi QB
|
Was QB
|
14.9
|
Dal QB
|
SD QB
|
3.7
|
|
Min QB
|
StL QB
|
26.9
|
Buf QB
|
NO QB
|
14.8
|
Atl QB
|
Det QB
|
3.7
|
|
Ari QB
|
Oak QB
|
26.6
|
Bal QB
|
Cin QB
|
14.8
|
Den QB
|
Oak QB
|
3.7
|
|
KC QB
|
Ten QB
|
26.6
|
Ari QB
|
Den QB
|
14.8
|
Cle QB
|
KC QB
|
3.5
|
|
Hou QB
|
Min QB
|
26.5
|
Mia QB
|
TB QB
|
14.7
|
Buf QB
|
Oak QB
|
3.4
|
|
Atl QB
|
SF QB
|
26.5
|
GB QB
|
NYG QB
|
14.6
|
KC QB
|
Mia QB
|
3.3
|
|
Ari QB
|
Min QB
|
26.4
|
Min QB
|
Phi QB
|
14.6
|
Dal QB
|
Pit QB
|
3.2
|
|
Car QB
|
Ind QB
|
26.4
|
Cin QB
|
Mia QB
|
14.5
|
Min QB
|
NYJ QB
|
3.1
|
|
NE QB
|
Sea QB
|
26.3
|
Oak QB
|
StL QB
|
14.3
|
Ari QB
|
Phi QB
|
3.1
|
|
Bal QB
|
Ind QB
|
26.3
|
Hou QB
|
KC QB
|
14.3
|
Cin QB
|
Cle QB
|
3.1
|
|
Bal QB
|
SF QB
|
26.3
|
Car QB
|
NYJ QB
|
14.3
|
Phi QB
|
Pit QB
|
2.9
|
|
NYJ QB
|
Sea QB
|
26.2
|
Buf QB
|
KC QB
|
14.3
|
Atl QB
|
Cin QB
|
2.5
|
|
NE QB
|
Ten QB
|
26.2
|
Ari QB
|
SD QB
|
14.3
|
Phi QB
|
TB QB
|
2.5
|
|
Min QB
|
NO QB
|
26.1
|
GB QB
|
TB QB
|
14.2
|
Phi QB
|
Was QB
|
2.4
|
|
Dal QB
|
StL QB
|
25.9
|
Bal QB
|
Jac QB
|
14.2
|
Den QB
|
TB QB
|
2.2
|
|
Car QB
|
Sea QB
|
25.9
|
Chi QB
|
NYG QB
|
14.1
|
Car QB
|
TB QB
|
2.2
|
|
Chi QB
|
Min QB
|
25.9
|
Bal QB
|
Buf QB
|
14.1
|
Atl QB
|
NE QB
|
2.0
|
|
Pit QB
|
Sea QB
|
25.8
|
NYG QB
|
Was QB
|
14.1
|
Den QB
|
SD QB
|
1.9
|
|
Jac QB
|
NYJ QB
|
25.8
|
Jac QB
|
Phi QB
|
14.1
|
Den QB
|
Min QB
|
1.9
|
|
Ind QB
|
Phi QB
|
25.8
|
Mia QB
|
SD QB
|
14.0
|
Car QB
|
Dal QB
|
1.8
|
|
Pit QB
|
Ten QB
|
25.7
|
Buf QB
|
Car QB
|
13.9
|
Buf QB
|
Den QB
|
1.7
|
|
StL QB
|
TB QB
|
25.6
|
Buf QB
|
NE QB
|
13.9
|
SD QB
|
TB QB
|
1.6
|
|
SD QB
|
Sea QB
|
25.5
|
Det QB
|
Was QB
|
13.8
|
Ari QB
|
Atl QB
|
1.4
|
|
Ten QB
|
Was QB
|
25.5
|
Jac QB
|
KC QB
|
13.8
|
Atl QB
|
KC QB
|
1.2
|
|
NYG QB
|
Ten QB
|
25.4
|
Cle QB
|
NO QB
|
13.8
|
Phi QB
|
SD QB
|
1.2
|
|
Ind QB
|
KC QB
|
25.3
|
Det QB
|
Oak QB
|
13.6
|
Den QB
|
Phi QB
|
1.1
|
|
SF QB
|
TB QB
|
25.2
|
Chi QB
|
Dal QB
|
13.6
|
Den QB
|
Jac QB
|
0.8
|
|
NO QB
|
StL QB
|
25.2
|
Oak QB
|
Pit QB
|
13.6
|
Cle QB
|
Dal QB
|
0.2
|
|
Oak QB
|
Ten QB
|
25.2
|
Det QB
|
Mia QB
|
13.4
|
Chi QB
|
SD QB
|
0.1
|
|
Atl QB
|
Ind QB
|
25.1
|
Buf QB
|
Phi QB
|
13.3
|
Det QB
|
Phi QB
|
-0.1
|
|
Ind QB
|
Oak QB
|
25.1
|
Bal QB
|
SD QB
|
13.2
|
Buf QB
|
NYJ QB
|
-0.8
|
|
Buf QB
|
Ten QB
|
25.0
|
Atl QB
|
Chi QB
|
13.0
|
Atl QB
|
TB QB
|
-0.8
|
|
Cin QB
|
SF QB
|
24.9
|
Chi QB
|
Det QB
|
13.0
|
Den QB
|
NYG QB
|
-0.9
|
|
Dal QB
|
Jac QB
|
24.7
|
GB QB
|
NE QB
|
12.9
|
KC QB
|
Was QB
|
-1.1
|
|
Ari QB
|
KC QB
|
24.7
|
GB QB
|
Was QB
|
12.7
|
Dal QB
|
Den QB
|
-1.2
|
|
Ari QB
|
Bal QB
|
24.6
|
Det QB
|
NYG QB
|
12.7
|
Car QB
|
SD QB
|
-1.4
|
|
Ari QB
|
Buf QB
|
24.6
|
Mia QB
|
Pit QB
|
12.7
|
Cin QB
|
Pit QB
|
-1.5
|
|
TB QB
|
Ten QB
|
24.6
|
Bal QB
|
Sea QB
|
12.7
|
NE QB
|
Phi QB
|
-1.5
|
|
KC QB
|
Sea QB
|
24.5
|
Car QB
|
GB QB
|
12.6
|
Den QB
|
KC QB
|
-1.6
|
|
Atl QB
|
StL QB
|
24.5
|
NE QB
|
NYJ QB
|
12.6
|
TB QB
|
Was QB
|
-2.1
|
|
GB QB
|
Min QB
|
24.4
|
Car QB
|
Mia QB
|
12.6
|
Cin QB
|
Was QB
|
-2.2
|
|
GB QB
|
StL QB
|
24.3
|
KC QB
|
NO QB
|
12.2
|
Dal QB
|
KC QB
|
-2.3
|
|
Ind QB
|
TB QB
|
24.3
|
Det QB
|
Jac QB
|
12.1
|
Atl QB
|
Den QB
|
-2.4
|
|
Atl QB
|
Ten QB
|
24.2
|
Mia QB
|
SF QB
|
12.1
|
Atl QB
|
Dal QB
|
-2.4
|
|
Cle QB
|
Ten QB
|
24.1
|
Car QB
|
Was QB
|
12.0
|
NYJ QB
|
Oak QB
|
-2.8
|
|
Mia QB
|
Min QB
|
24.0
|
Dal QB
|
SF QB
|
11.8
|
Cle QB
|
Min QB
|
-3.0
|
|
Jac QB
|
Mia QB
|
23.9
|
Ari QB
|
Car QB
|
11.7
|
NE QB
|
Was QB
|
-3.3
|
|
Min QB
|
NYG QB
|
23.9
|
NYJ QB
|
TB QB
|
11.6
|
Atl QB
|
SD QB
|
-3.5
|
|
Ari QB
|
GB QB
|
23.9
|
Bal QB
|
NE QB
|
11.6
|
Bal QB
|
Dal QB
|
-3.6
|
|
Hou QB
|
Was QB
|
23.8
|
Buf QB
|
Det QB
|
11.6
|
Cle QB
|
Oak QB
|
-3.7
|
|
Atl QB
|
Sea QB
|
23.8
|
Oak QB
|
SD QB
|
11.6
|
Bal QB
|
Det QB
|
-4.0
|
|
Chi QB
|
Hou QB
|
23.7
|
Buf QB
|
TB QB
|
11.5
|
Den QB
|
NE QB
|
-4.0
|
|
Chi QB
|
Jac QB
|
23.5
|
Cin QB
|
GB QB
|
11.5
|
Buf QB
|
Cle QB
|
-4.0
|
|
Phi QB
|
StL QB
|
23.4
|
Atl QB
|
GB QB
|
11.5
|
Pit QB
|
Was QB
|
-4.4
|
|
Buf QB
|
Chi QB
|
23.3
|
Atl QB
|
NYG QB
|
11.5
|
Den QB
|
NYJ QB
|
-4.4
|
|
Phi QB
|
Sea QB
|
23.2
|
Det QB
|
NYJ QB
|
11.5
|
Cin QB
|
Den QB
|
-4.6
|
|
GB QB
|
Mia QB
|
23.2
|
Min QB
|
Oak QB
|
11.3
|
Pit QB
|
TB QB
|
-4.9
|
|
Bal QB
|
GB QB
|
23.2
|
Car QB
|
NYG QB
|
11.3
|
Cin QB
|
TB QB
|
-5.2
|
|
Ari QB
|
Dal QB
|
23.1
|
Dal QB
|
NE QB
|
11.3
|
Den QB
|
Pit QB
|
-5.6
|
|
Det QB
|
StL QB
|
23.0
|
Chi QB
|
KC QB
|
11.2
|
Dal QB
|
Mia QB
|
-5.6
|
|
Car QB
|
Hou QB
|
23.0
|
Bal QB
|
Mia QB
|
11.2
|
GB QB
|
SD QB
|
-6.0
|
|
Cin QB
|
StL QB
|
22.9
|
Bal QB
|
Cle QB
|
11.1
|
Cin QB
|
NE QB
|
-6.3
|
|
Jac QB
|
TB QB
|
22.6
|
Hou QB
|
NYG QB
|
11.1
|
KC QB
|
NE QB
|
-6.5
|
|
NO QB
|
Ten QB
|
22.4
|
NYJ QB
|
SD QB
|
11.1
|
NO QB
|
SD QB
|
-6.9
|
|
Den QB
|
SF QB
|
22.4
|
NYJ QB
|
StL QB
|
11.0
|
NE QB
|
TB QB
|
-7.7
|
|
Cle QB
|
SF QB
|
22.3
|
NO QB
|
Pit QB
|
11.0
|
NE QB
|
Pit QB
|
-7.8
|
|
Car QB
|
Jac QB
|
22.3
|
Cle QB
|
Was QB
|
11.0
|
KC QB
|
TB QB
|
-8.3
|
|
Ind QB
|
NO QB
|
22.2
|
NO QB
|
NYJ QB
|
10.9
|
Car QB
|
Phi QB
|
-8.4
|
|
Hou QB
|
NO QB
|
22.0
|
SD QB
|
Was QB
|
10.9
|
Cin QB
|
KC QB
|
-8.6
|
|
Det QB
|
Min QB
|
21.8
|
NYJ QB
|
Was QB
|
10.9
|
Atl QB
|
Car QB
|
-9.0
|
|
Min QB
|
TB QB
|
21.7
|
Car QB
|
Oak QB
|
10.8
|
Cle QB
|
NYJ QB
|
-10.0
|
|
Mia QB
|
Oak QB
|
21.7
|
Mia QB
|
NE QB
|
10.7
|
KC QB
|
Pit QB
|
-10.1
|
|
Mia QB
|
NYJ QB
|
21.6
|
NO QB
|
Phi QB
|
10.6
|
Bal QB
|
Den QB
|
-10.8
|
|
Chi QB
|
NE QB
|
21.5
|
Dal QB
|
Ind QB
|
10.6
|
Cle QB
|
Den QB
|
-11.7
|
|
Mia QB
|
Was QB
|
21.5
|
Bal QB
|
TB QB
|
10.6
|
Den QB
|
Det QB
|
-12.6
|
|
Chi QB
|
NYJ QB
|
21.5
|
Oak QB
|
Phi QB
|
10.5
|
Atl QB
|
Phi QB
|
-15.1
|
| . | . | . |
Det QB
|
Ten QB
|
10.5
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
Going with a Trio
If you play in a league with large rosters and/or you like the idea of three QBs, the table below shows the top 50 trios based solely on strength of schedule:
|
FP Adv
|
Quarterback Trio
|
||
|
68.7
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
68.2
|
Ind QB
|
Min QB
|
StL QB
|
|
66.8
|
Ind QB
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
65.9
|
Ten QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
65.8
|
Chi QB
|
StL QB
|
SF QB
|
|
64.8
|
Ind QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
64.5
|
Chi QB
|
Min QB
|
StL QB
|
|
64.5
|
Hou QB
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
64.3
|
Chi QB
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
64.0
|
Ind QB
|
GB QB
|
Min QB
|
|
63.8
|
Ind QB
|
Min QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
63.3
|
Ind QB
|
Jac QB
|
StL QB
|
|
63.2
|
Ind QB
|
StL QB
|
SF QB
|
|
63.0
|
Ind QB
|
Ari QB
|
SF QB
|
|
62.9
|
Oak QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
62.9
|
Min QB
|
StL QB
|
SF QB
|
|
62.7
|
Chi QB
|
Ari QB
|
SF QB
|
|
62.6
|
Buf QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
62.6
|
Jac QB
|
StL QB
|
SF QB
|
|
62.6
|
Ind QB
|
Ten QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
62.5
|
Min QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
61.7
|
Det QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
61.7
|
Oak QB
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
61.5
|
StL QB
|
SF QB
|
Was QB
|
|
61.4
|
Hou QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
61.4
|
Ari QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
61.3
|
Ind QB
|
Ari QB
|
Min QB
|
|
61.2
|
Chi QB
|
Ari QB
|
StL QB
|
|
61.0
|
Det QB
|
Min QB
|
SF QB
|
|
60.7
|
Jac QB
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
60.6
|
Min QB
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
60.6
|
Hou QB
|
Ten QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
60.5
|
Ari QB
|
Ten QB
|
SF QB
|
|
60.5
|
Ind QB
|
Ari QB
|
StL QB
|
|
60.4
|
Ind QB
|
Min QB
|
SF QB
|
|
60.4
|
Pit QB
|
StL QB
|
SF QB
|
|
60.2
|
Car QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
60.2
|
Cle QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
60.1
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
Was QB
|
|
59.9
|
Hou QB
|
StL QB
|
SF QB
|
|
59.8
|
NYG QB
|
StL QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
59.7
|
Chi QB
|
Jac QB
|
StL QB
|
|
59.6
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
Was QB
|
|
59.5
|
SD QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
59.4
|
Ind QB
|
Jac QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
59.3
|
Jac QB
|
Sea QB
|
SF QB
|
|
59.2
|
Ind QB
|
Ari QB
|
Sea QB
|
|
59.1
|
Ind QB
|
Hou QB
|
StL QB
|
|
59.1
|
Min QB
|
NYG QB
|
StL QB
|
|
59.0
|
Ind QB
|
Min QB
|
Ten QB
|
Overall Schedule Strength
Even if you don't believe in committees, or have no preset draft plan, it pays to know how tough of a schedule each team has. Peyton Manning could be in store for a huge year, even by his standards. He projects to have the easiest schedule in the NFL, with the four NFC West teams not too far behind him. Six AFC teams face the hardest schedule, with three from the West and three from the North. Denver's going to have a tough enough time replacing Jay Cutler, and Kyle Orton isn't getting any help with the league's toughest projected fantasy schedule.
|
SOS
|
Team
|
|
25.5
|
Indianapolis Colts
|
|
21.6
|
San Francisco 49ers
|
|
19.5
|
Seattle Seahawks
|
|
17.2
|
St. Louis Rams
|
|
12.9
|
Arizona Cardinals
|
|
12.5
|
Tennessee Titans
|
|
11.8
|
Jacksonville Jaguars
|
|
6.8
|
Houston Texans
|
|
6.7
|
Buffalo Bills
|
|
4.2
|
Minnesota Vikings
|
|
3.5
|
Miami Dolphins
|
|
2.4
|
Washington Redskins
|
|
0.2
|
Oakland Raiders
|
|
0.2
|
Chicago Bears
|
|
-0.4
|
New Orleans Saints
|
|
-0.6
|
New York Jets
|
|
-1.3
|
Green Bay Packers
|
|
-3.0
|
New York Giants
|
|
-3.1
|
Carolina Panthers
|
|
-3.1
|
New England Patriots
|
|
-3.5
|
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
|
|
-6.9
|
Pittsburgh Steelers
|
|
-7.9
|
Atlanta Falcons
|
|
-9.2
|
Philadelphia Eagles
|
|
-9.9
|
Detroit Lions
|
|
-10.4
|
Dallas Cowboys
|
|
-10.7
|
San Diego Chargers
|
|
-10.9
|
Baltimore Ravens
|
|
-11.8
|
Kansas City Chiefs
|
|
-15.1
|
Cincinnati Bengals
|
|
-15.9
|
Cleveland Browns
|
|
-21.3
|
Denver Broncos
|
Play in a Start 2-QB League?
With a growing number of leagues requiring fantasy teams to start 2 QBs, how does strength of schedule come into play? Check out my other article, on QBBC for Start-2-QB leagues.















