|
Quarterback Performance: Home vs. Road
|
|
Posted 8/23 by Steve Aldersley, Freelance Submission to Footballguys.com
|
There are many drafting strategies involved in Fantasy Football.
Some owners like to lock up a top quarterback early in the draft, while others
prefer to wait until the middle rounds and then draft two or three in close
proximity. Dynasty and keeper leagues may see an even wider variety of strategies
being employed. But whatever your preference, you will likely end up with
two or more starting quarterbacks on your team. There may be times when you
face a tough decision on which player to start.
The purpose of this article is to compare the home and road
performances of twenty of the most prominent starting quarterbacks for the
coming season. Some weekly plays will be clearer than others. If one of your
starters is playing a defense that is weak against the pass, it would be easy
to start him. But what if your two main starters face similar strength of
opposition? An extra few points could mean the difference between a win and a
loss, so I am aiming to spot trends in order to help identify the weekly
starter that has the most in their favor. Some of the results may surprise you.
The following data was largely obtained from the Footballguys Player Profiles
and it shows the statistics from the last four seasons at home and on
the road. The scoring is based on 1 point per 20 yards passing, 4 points per
passing TD, 1 point per 10 yards rushing, 6 points per rushing TD and –1 point
per interception thrown.
Peyton Manning IND
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
2077
|
13
|
9
|
65
|
1
|
19.9
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
2122
|
14
|
10
|
83
|
1
|
20.8
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
2066
|
17
|
3
|
10
|
0
|
21.2
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
2201
|
12
|
7
|
16
|
0
|
19.1
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
2604
|
26
|
6
|
12
|
0
|
28.7
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1953
|
23
|
4
|
26
|
0
|
23.5
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1611
|
11
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
15.0
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
2136
|
17
|
5
|
40
|
0
|
21.7
|
|
Total Home
|
32
|
8358
|
67
|
23
|
92
|
1
|
21.2
|
|
Total Road
|
32
|
8412
|
66
|
26
|
165
|
1
|
21.3
|
Manning’s figures have been slightly skewed in the last two
seasons because the Colts have ended both seasons with meaningless games. In
2004, Manning played just one series in Week 17 at Denver. If he had played a
full game, there would not have been a 5.2 points per game difference between
home and road games that year. It would have been just over 2 points per game
if he played an average game. Last year, Manning was used sparingly in the
final two games. One was on the road and the other at home so they balance out,
but it should be noted that his average points per game were artificially low
because of that. His overall record sees very little difference in home or road
games. In any case, he is so effective that you would not want to bench him
against any opponent whether at home or on the road.
|
Tom Brady, NE
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1793
|
16
|
6
|
64
|
0
|
19.3
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
1971
|
12
|
8
|
46
|
1
|
18.6
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1578
|
7
|
0
|
30
|
1
|
14.5
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
2042
|
16
|
12
|
33
|
0
|
19.7
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
1763
|
13
|
5
|
12
|
0
|
17.0
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1929
|
15
|
9
|
16
|
0
|
18.6
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1782
|
14
|
2
|
38
|
0
|
18.4
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
2328
|
12
|
12
|
51
|
1
|
20.4
|
|
Total Home
|
32
|
6916
|
50
|
13
|
144
|
1
|
17.3
|
|
Total Road
|
32
|
8270
|
55
|
41
|
146
|
1
|
19.3
|
There seems to be slight increase in Brady’s fantasy numbers
when he plays on the road. The Patriots have been dominant at home but are
sometimes forced into chasing the game when on the road. Brady is far more
efficient at home; boasting a healthy 50:13 TD/INT ratio. His road numbers are
55:41, but he has thrown for an additional 1354 yards in those games. Over four
years, Brady has averaged 2 points per game more in road games.
|
Matt Hasselbeck,
SEA
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
6
|
1332
|
6
|
5
|
122
|
0
|
16.3
|
|
Road 2002
|
7
|
1743
|
9
|
5
|
80
|
1
|
18.9
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1744
|
12
|
5
|
81
|
1
|
18.0
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
2100
|
14
|
10
|
44
|
1
|
20.2
|
|
Home 2004
|
6
|
1461
|
11
|
3
|
59
|
1
|
21.0
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1921
|
11
|
12
|
31
|
0
|
16.4
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1801
|
13
|
7
|
78
|
0
|
17.9
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1654
|
11
|
2
|
46
|
1
|
16.9
|
|
Total Home
|
28
|
6338
|
42
|
20
|
340
|
2
|
18.3
|
|
Total Road
|
31
|
7418
|
45
|
29
|
201
|
3
|
18.1
|
Hasselbeck does not have an appreciable difference in his
home and road numbers over the last four years. He has two seasons of producing
bigger numbers on the road, but has recently balanced it with two strong home
seasons.
|
Donovan McNabb, PHI
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
6
|
1346
|
10
|
3
|
263
|
3
|
24.8
|
|
Road 2002
|
4
|
943
|
7
|
3
|
197
|
3
|
27.5
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1683
|
9
|
8
|
225
|
0
|
16.8
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
1533
|
7
|
3
|
130
|
3
|
16.5
|
|
Home 2004
|
7
|
1912
|
17
|
4
|
140
|
1
|
25.7
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1963
|
14
|
4
|
80
|
2
|
21.3
|
|
Home 2005
|
4
|
1163
|
8
|
4
|
29
|
1
|
23.8
|
|
Road 2005
|
5
|
1344
|
8
|
5
|
13
|
0
|
19.4
|
|
Total Home
|
25
|
6104
|
44
|
19
|
657
|
5
|
22.3
|
|
Total Road
|
25
|
5783
|
36
|
15
|
420
|
8
|
20.4
|
McNabb had a 2.7 points per game road advantage in 2002, but
those numbers are less reliable due to the six games he missed. 2003 showed
very little difference at home or on the road, but his two most recent seasons
show a big preference for home games. I will reserve judgement on McNabb as he
has had success wherever he plays. The 1.9 points per game advantage in home
games is not something I would rely on because it has not happened every year.
He is a good start wherever he plays.
|
Eli Manning, NYG
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2004
|
4
|
636
|
6
|
6
|
35
|
0
|
13.3
|
|
Road 2004
|
4
|
407
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
4.3
|
|
Home 2005
|
9
|
1840
|
15
|
11
|
26
|
0
|
16.0
|
|
Road 2005
|
7
|
1922
|
9
|
6
|
54
|
1
|
19.6
|
|
Total Home
|
13
|
2476
|
21
|
17
|
61
|
0
|
15.1
|
|
Total Road
|
11
|
2329
|
9
|
9
|
54
|
1
|
14.1
|
With just one point per game difference in Manning’s home
and road performances, and with such a small sample size, I am not going to
attempt to read anything into his production.
|
Marc Bulger, STL
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
5
|
1570
|
12
|
4
|
-9
|
1
|
25.5
|
|
Road 2002
|
2
|
256
|
2
|
2
|
-4
|
0
|
9.2
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1904
|
14
|
10
|
38
|
3
|
20.4
|
|
Road 2003
|
7
|
1941
|
8
|
12
|
37
|
1
|
18.1
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
2138
|
11
|
5
|
55
|
1
|
19.7
|
|
Road 2004
|
6
|
1826
|
10
|
9
|
34
|
2
|
22.9
|
|
Home 2005
|
3
|
852
|
7
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
23.0
|
|
Road 2005
|
5
|
1445
|
7
|
7
|
26
|
0
|
19.2
|
|
Total Home
|
24
|
6464
|
44
|
21
|
87
|
5
|
21.5
|
|
Total Road
|
20
|
5468
|
27
|
30
|
93
|
3
|
18.9
|
Bulger is another with an injury history, but I believe
there is some useful information obtained within his limited appearances. His
2002 road performances can be ignored as he only played one full game and
attempted one pass in the other. What really stands out over the last four
seasons is the TD/INT ratio. Bulger is 44:21 in home games but is only 27:30
when on the road. An average of 18.9 points per game on the road is still good
for fantasy purposes, but he is even better at home, averaging 2.6 points per
game more. If your league rewards TDs more heavily, or subtracts more points
for interceptions, be aware of the difference in Bulger’s performances.
|
Drew Bledsoe, DAL
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
2264
|
13
|
6
|
43
|
2
|
21.9
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
2095
|
11
|
9
|
24
|
0
|
17.8
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1486
|
5
|
5
|
18
|
2
|
12.9
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
1374
|
6
|
7
|
11
|
0
|
10.8
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
1351
|
10
|
4
|
-5
|
0
|
12.9
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1581
|
10
|
12
|
42
|
0
|
13.9
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1998
|
12
|
5
|
25
|
1
|
18.9
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1641
|
11
|
12
|
25
|
1
|
15.3
|
|
Total Home
|
32
|
7099
|
40
|
20
|
81
|
5
|
16.7
|
|
Total Road
|
32
|
6691
|
38
|
40
|
102
|
1
|
14.5
|
Bledsoe is another that tends to perform better in home
games. His 40:20 TD/INT ratio is impressive, but road games have not been so
productive at 38:40. He has also thrown for more yardage at home. Bledsoe
averages an extra 2.2 points per game when at home, and 4.6 points higher in his
first year with the Cowboys.
|
Jake Delhomme, CAR
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1846
|
12
|
7
|
28
|
1
|
17.8
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
1373
|
7
|
9
|
11
|
0
|
11.1
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
1929
|
12
|
7
|
38
|
0
|
17.6
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1957
|
17
|
8
|
33
|
1
|
20.9
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1676
|
12
|
8
|
18
|
0
|
15.7
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1745
|
12
|
8
|
13
|
1
|
16.8
|
|
Total Home
|
24
|
5451
|
36
|
22
|
84
|
1
|
17.0
|
|
Total Road
|
24
|
5075
|
36
|
25
|
57
|
2
|
16.3
|
Delhomme was far more productive at home during the 2003
season, and that may have had something to do with it being his first full year
as the starter. The last two years have seen him put up very similar numbers
whether at home or on the road.
|
Carson Palmer, CIN
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2004
|
6
|
1289
|
8
|
9
|
13
|
1
|
15.8
|
|
Road 2004
|
7
|
1608
|
10
|
9
|
34
|
0
|
16.4
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
2073
|
15
|
9
|
40
|
1
|
20.6
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1763
|
17
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
19.1
|
|
Total Home
|
14
|
3362
|
23
|
18
|
53
|
2
|
18.5
|
|
Total Road
|
15
|
3371
|
27
|
12
|
35
|
0
|
17.9
|
Palmer has not started many games thus far, and his
performances look fairly balanced.
|
Jake Plummer, DEN
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1530
|
10
|
9
|
125
|
0
|
15.0
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
1442
|
8
|
11
|
158
|
2
|
15.1
|
|
Home 2003
|
6
|
1410
|
9
|
2
|
144
|
1
|
20.8
|
|
Road 2003
|
5
|
772
|
6
|
5
|
61
|
2
|
15.1
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
2193
|
17
|
10
|
83
|
1
|
22.8
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1896
|
10
|
10
|
119
|
0
|
17.1
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1792
|
9
|
2
|
76
|
2
|
17.9
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1574
|
9
|
5
|
75
|
0
|
14.7
|
|
Total Home
|
30
|
6925
|
45
|
23
|
428
|
4
|
19.0
|
|
Total Road
|
29
|
5684
|
33
|
31
|
413
|
4
|
15.5
|
Plummer saw similar production at home and on the road
during his last season in Arizona, but there has been a significant change
since he was acquired by Denver. Even allowing for the 2002 season, Plummer
still shows a distinct preference for playing at home. His home TD/INT ratio of
45:23 is a lot different from his 33:31 on the road. He also tends to gain a
lot more yardage at home. This all leads to a big difference in fantasy points,
and Plummer averages 3.5 points per game more when he plays at home.
|
Trent Green, KC
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1750
|
13
|
5
|
144
|
1
|
19.4
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
1940
|
13
|
8
|
81
|
0
|
18.6
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1923
|
14
|
5
|
59
|
0
|
19.1
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
2116
|
10
|
7
|
24
|
1
|
18.4
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
2242
|
13
|
5
|
37
|
0
|
20.4
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
2349
|
14
|
12
|
48
|
0
|
20.8
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1964
|
10
|
5
|
44
|
0
|
17.2
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
2050
|
7
|
5
|
38
|
0
|
16.2
|
|
Total Home
|
32
|
7879
|
50
|
20
|
284
|
1
|
19.0
|
|
Total Road
|
32
|
8455
|
44
|
32
|
191
|
1
|
18.5
|
Green is another that is far more efficient at home,
boasting a 50:20 TD/INT ratio. His road games see that drop to 44:32, but he
throws for more yardage. The overall result is that there is very little
difference between Green’s home and road fantasy points totals.
|
Michael Vick, ATL
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1428
|
9
|
5
|
336
|
2
|
18.5
|
|
Road 2002
|
7
|
1508
|
7
|
3
|
440
|
6
|
25.8
|
|
Home 2003
|
2
|
359
|
2
|
2
|
170
|
1
|
23.5
|
|
Road 2003
|
3
|
226
|
2
|
1
|
85
|
0
|
8.9
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
1366
|
8
|
7
|
482
|
3
|
19.9
|
|
Road 2004
|
7
|
947
|
6
|
5
|
420
|
0
|
15.5
|
|
Home 2005
|
7
|
1182
|
6
|
6
|
219
|
6
|
19.3
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1230
|
9
|
7
|
378
|
0
|
15.9
|
|
Total Home
|
25
|
4335
|
25
|
20
|
1207
|
12
|
19.6
|
|
Total Road
|
25
|
3911
|
24
|
16
|
1323
|
6
|
17.7
|
Michael Vick is one of the hardest players to predict from
one week to the next. The main reason is that he relies so much on his rushing
ability. It is hard to judge when Vick will run in a TD. He did well in 2002
but his road totals were boosted by 440 yards rushing and 6 TDs. He was hurt
for most of 2003. The last two years have seen Vick perform much better when he
is at home. He has run in 9 TDs in the last 15 home games, compared to none on the
road over the same period. So while his overall numbers show that he averages
an extra 1.9 points per game at home, that figure is around 4 points per game
over the last two seasons. I would feel much happier starting Vick if he were
playing at home.
|
Aaron Brooks, OAK
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1741
|
12
|
9
|
104
|
1
|
17.8
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
1831
|
15
|
6
|
152
|
1
|
20.9
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1700
|
13
|
5
|
89
|
0
|
17.6
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
1846
|
11
|
3
|
86
|
2
|
19.2
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
1971
|
13
|
11
|
88
|
3
|
20.8
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1839
|
8
|
5
|
85
|
1
|
16.7
|
|
Home 2005
|
5
|
997
|
3
|
8
|
98
|
2
|
15.1
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1885
|
10
|
9
|
183
|
0
|
17.9
|
|
Total Home
|
29
|
6409
|
41
|
33
|
379
|
6
|
18.1
|
|
Total Road
|
32
|
7401
|
44
|
23
|
506
|
4
|
18.7
|
Brooks has been very efficient on the road, and has a 44:23
TD/INT ratio in those games. That is
significantly better than in his home games but overall his fantasy points
totals are similar whatever the venue.
|
Ben Roethlisberger,
PIT
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2004
|
7
|
1280
|
8
|
5
|
41
|
1
|
14.4
|
|
Road 2004
|
7
|
1341
|
9
|
6
|
103
|
0
|
15.3
|
|
Home 2005
|
6
|
1305
|
10
|
6
|
31
|
1
|
18.1
|
|
Road 2005
|
7
|
1080
|
7
|
3
|
38
|
2
|
13.5
|
|
Total Home
|
13
|
2585
|
18
|
11
|
72
|
2
|
16.1
|
|
Total Road
|
14
|
2421
|
16
|
9
|
141
|
2
|
14.4
|
Roethlisberger performed better on the road in 2004, and
significantly better at home in 2005. But the number of games played is too
small to draw any definite conclusions as yet.
|
Drew Brees, NO
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1902
|
10
|
10
|
68
|
0
|
16.5
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
1382
|
7
|
6
|
62
|
1
|
12.9
|
|
Home 2003
|
5
|
1102
|
4
|
8
|
55
|
0
|
13.7
|
|
Road 2003
|
6
|
1006
|
7
|
7
|
29
|
0
|
13.7
|
|
Home 2004
|
7
|
1427
|
17
|
5
|
30
|
0
|
19.6
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1732
|
10
|
2
|
55
|
2
|
18.2
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1789
|
16
|
5
|
15
|
1
|
19.5
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1787
|
8
|
10
|
34
|
0
|
14.3
|
|
Total Home
|
28
|
6220
|
47
|
28
|
168
|
1
|
17.6
|
|
Total Road
|
30
|
5907
|
32
|
25
|
180
|
3
|
14.9
|
Brees will have a new home this year, but while with the
Chargers he performed better at home in three of his four seasons. Last season
saw him average 5.2 more points in home games. His overall record shows a 2.7
points per game advantage when he is playing at home.
|
Brett Favre, GB
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1660
|
11
|
6
|
21
|
0
|
15.4
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
1998
|
16
|
10
|
52
|
0
|
19.9
|
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1410
|
12
|
12
|
17
|
0
|
13.5
|
|
Road 2003
|
8
|
1951
|
20
|
9
|
-2
|
0
|
21.1
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
1964
|
16
|
9
|
27
|
0
|
19.5
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
2124
|
14
|
8
|
9
|
0
|
19.4
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1939
|
11
|
14
|
41
|
0
|
16.4
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1942
|
9
|
15
|
21
|
0
|
15.0
|
|
Total Home
|
32
|
6973
|
50
|
41
|
106
|
0
|
16.2
|
|
Total Road
|
32
|
8015
|
59
|
42
|
80
|
0
|
18.8
|
Favre’s statistics show that he played much better in road
games in 2002 and 2003. But over the last two seasons, he has been more
effective when playing at home. The last four years show that he has averaged
an extra 2.6 points per game when playing on the road. That seemed unusual so I
dug deeper and looked at his entire career. I found that he averaged 19.7
points per game at home, and 19.6 when on the road. So I would say that there
is very little difference in performance overall.
|
Kurt Warner, ARI
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
3
|
296
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
0
|
5.4
|
|
Road 2002
|
4
|
1135
|
2
|
8
|
28
|
0
|
14.9
|
|
Home 2003
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0
|
|
Road 2003
|
2
|
365
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
10.6
|
|
Home 2004
|
4
|
983
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
16.1
|
|
Road 2004
|
6
|
1071
|
3
|
1
|
29
|
0
|
11.2
|
|
Home 2005
|
4
|
1231
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
0
|
18.1
|
|
Road 2005
|
6
|
1482
|
7
|
3
|
20
|
0
|
16.8
|
|
Total Home
|
11
|
2510
|
8
|
12
|
14
|
1
|
13.9
|
|
Total Road
|
18
|
4053
|
13
|
13
|
77
|
0
|
13.9
|
Warner has been either hurt or benched for much of the last
four years. Even with the small sample size it seems that there is very little
difference in his performances. I would not draw any conclusions from this
data.
|
Daunte Culpepper,
MIA
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1801
|
10
|
12
|
314
|
4
|
21.7
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
2058
|
8
|
11
|
289
|
6
|
23.6
|
|
Home 2003
|
7
|
1664
|
14
|
4
|
146
|
1
|
22.3
|
|
Road 2003
|
7
|
1815
|
11
|
7
|
276
|
3
|
24.8
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
2039
|
16
|
4
|
180
|
2
|
24.0
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
2678
|
23
|
7
|
226
|
0
|
30.2
|
|
Home 2005
|
3
|
813
|
5
|
3
|
95
|
0
|
22.4
|
|
Road 2005
|
4
|
751
|
1
|
9
|
52
|
1
|
10.9
|
|
Total Home
|
26
|
6317
|
45
|
23
|
735
|
7
|
22.6
|
|
Total Road
|
27
|
7302
|
43
|
34
|
843
|
10
|
24.0
|
In three of the last four seasons, Culpepper has produced
more fantasy points when on the road. His 2004 season showed an incredible
difference of 6.2 points per game and he threw for 2678 yards and 23 TDs in his
eight road games. Last season was cut short by injury, but he was scoring more
than double the fantasy points in his few home games. Overall, he seems to
favor road games but I would simply watch him this year as he is with a new
team and will be trying to come back from an injury.
|
Byron Leftwich, JAC
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2003
|
8
|
1570
|
9
|
7
|
53
|
2
|
15.6
|
|
Road 2003
|
7
|
1249
|
5
|
9
|
55
|
0
|
11.3
|
|
Home 2004
|
6
|
1281
|
7
|
2
|
64
|
1
|
17.1
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1660
|
8
|
8
|
84
|
1
|
15.1
|
|
Home 2005
|
5
|
1082
|
7
|
2
|
25
|
1
|
17.7
|
|
Road 2005
|
6
|
1041
|
8
|
3
|
42
|
1
|
15.2
|
|
Total Home
|
19
|
3933
|
23
|
11
|
142
|
4
|
16.6
|
|
Total Road
|
21
|
3950
|
21
|
20
|
181
|
2
|
13.9
|
Leftwich has scored more points at home every year since he
joined the league in 2003. His first year showed the biggest variance, perhaps
because he was playing as a rookie and felt more comfortable in a familiar
situation. The last two years have seen the gap narrow but he is still clearly
a better start when playing at home. His overall career shows that he averages
an extra 2.7 points per game at home.
|
David Carr, HOU
|
G
|
Pass
|
TD
|
INT
|
Rush
|
TD
|
FP/G
|
Home 2002
|
8
|
1402
|
4
|
8
|
178
|
3
|
10.4
|
|
Road 2002
|
8
|
1190
|
5
|
7
|
104
|
0
|
14.2
|
|
Home 2003
|
6
|
943
|
3
|
7
|
114
|
1
|
11.6
|
|
Road 2003
|
6
|
1070
|
6
|
6
|
37
|
1
|
13.5
|
|
Home 2004
|
8
|
1751
|
10
|
4
|
172
|
0
|
17.6
|
|
Road 2004
|
8
|
1780
|
6
|
10
|
127
|
0
|
14.5
|
|
Home 2005
|
8
|
1404
|
9
|
7
|
187
|
0
|
14.7
|
|
Road 2005
|
8
|
1084
|
5
|
4
|
121
|
1
|
11.0
|
|
Total Home
|
30
|
5500
|
26
|
26
|
651
|
4
|
14.7
|
|
Total Road
|
30
|
5124
|
22
|
27
|
389
|
2
|
12.3
|
Carr began his career with two seasons in which his road
production was much higher than his home production. The last two years have
seen exactly the opposite. His overall figures give him a 2.4 points per game
advantage in home games, but his 14.7 average makes him a weak start in any
case.
Conclusions
The top quarterbacks each season will usually average around
20 points per start. The objective is to get within two or three points of that
number if possible. That is somewhat easier if you are starting a top five
performer, but it is also possible using a committee if the correct opponents
are targeted.
Peyton Manning averages over 21 points per game whether at
home or on the road. He should be started unless it is clear that the Colts
have clinched their best possible playoff position and plan to sit him early.
Daunte Culpepper also has a great average and has exceeded
20 points per game at home and on the road apart from his four home games in
2005. The two big questions are will he be healthy and what effect will
changing teams have on his production? Those doubts aside, Culpepper is a
proven performer. Chris Chambers will probably not make up for the loss of
Randy Moss, but he is certainly a capable target.
Donovan McNabb is the only other quarterback to have
averaged over 20 points over the four year period in both road and home games.
Some will be wary of him with Terrell Owens gone, but his 2002 season proves
that he is capable of good production without a star receiver.
Marc Bulger has played very well in home games and has
averaged 21.5 points in 24 starts. I would be very confident starting him
against any opponent at home. The Rams have an excellent receiving corps. The
only slight doubt is whether Linehan will change things enough to affect
Bulger, but Culpepper certainly thrived in his system so I am not too worried.
Although Bulger is far less effective on the road in terms of TD/INT ratio, he
still averages 18.9 points and should be started. Bulger’s points per game
averages make him a great start when healthy. He would be ranked a lot higher
if he were projected to last a full 16 games.
Tom Brady is the odd man out. He averages a full 2 points
more when on the road. That is probably partially due to the dominance the
Patriots have shown at home, and the ability of the running game to kill the
clock late in the game. Brady is still a good start at home, but be aware that
his production may suffer unless the Patriots have a challenging opponent.
I would suggest using quarterbacks in the following
situations if possible.
Home
Elite Starts
Peyton Manning (average 21.2 points)
Donovan McNabb (22.3 average but Owens gone)
Marc Bulger (21.5 average)
Carson Palmer (18.5 average but still improving, rehabbing
from an injury)
Good Starts Against The Appropriate Opponent
Daunte Culpepper (22.6 average, changed teams, lost Moss,
recovering from a serious injury)
Michael Vick (19.6 average)
Trent Green (19.0 average)
Matt Hasselbeck (18.3 average)
Tom Brady (17.3 average, often sees less production at home)
Eli Manning (15.1 average but can be expected to keep
improving)
Drew Bledsoe (16.7 average but Owens should provide a spark)
Aaron Brooks (18.1 average, new team, now has Randy Moss to
throw to)
Kurt Warner (18.1 average)
Jake Delhomme (17.0 average, Keyshawn Johnson will be
another target in 2006)
Jake Plummer (19.0 average and Walker added)
Drew Brees (17.6 average, new team, recovering from injury)
Brett Favre (16.2 average but has done better over his whole
career)
Less Than Ideal Starts
Ben Roethlisberger (16.1 average but 18.1 in 2005,
recovering from injury)
Byron Leftwich (16.6 average, lost Jimmy Smith)
David Carr (14.7 average, Moulds added, new offense)
Road
Elite Starts
Peyton Manning (21.3 average)
Donovan McNabb (20.4 average)
Tom Brady (19.3 average, 2 points more than in home games)
Marc Bulger (18.9 average)
Carson Palmer (17.9 average)
Good Starts Against The Appropriate Opponent
Daunte Culpepper (24.0 average)
Trent Green (18.5 average)
Matt Hasselbeck (18.1 average)
Eli Manning (14.1 average but 19.6 in 2005)
Brett Favre (18.8 average)
Aaron Brooks (18.7 average)
Michael Vick (17.7 average)
Kurt Warner (16.8 average)
Drew Bledsoe (14.5 average)
Less Than Ideal Starts
Jake Delhomme (16.3 average)
Jake Plummer (15.5 average, 3.5 less than in home games)
Drew Brees (14.9 average)
Ben Roethlisberger (14.4 average)
Byron Leftwich (13.9 average, 2.7 less than in home games)
David Carr (12.3 average)
I hope this article helps you identify the best possible
starter for your team. A point or two could be the difference, so be aware of
the trends.
|